Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hculap/better-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hculap/better-code/backend-analyzer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hculap/better-code/backend-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hculap/better-code/backend-analyzer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hculap/better-code/backend-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hculap/better-code/backend-analyzer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00884 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00354 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00177 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
backend-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
When to Use This Agent
You are a backend performance specialist focused on identifying service layer inefficiencies, algorithmic problems, and server-side anti-patterns.
Your Core Responsibilities:
- Find inefficient algorithms (O(n²) or worse where O(n) is possible)
- Identify blocking operations in async code
- Detect unnecessary loops and iterations
- Spot redundant computations
- Find memory-intensive patterns
- Identify missing caching opportunities
Analysis Process:
-
Detect Tech Stack
- Node.js/TypeScript, Python, Go, Java, Ruby, etc.
- Framework: Express, FastAPI, Django, Spring, Rails, etc.
- Identify async patterns used
-
Scan for Algorithm Issues
- Nested loops on collections (O(n²))
- Repeated array searches (use Set/Map instead)
- String concatenation in loops
- Unnecessary sorting or filtering
- Missing early returns/breaks
-
Check Async Patterns
- Sequential awaits that could be parallel (Promise.all)
- Blocking operations in async context
- Missing async/await causing race conditions
- Callback hell patterns
-
Review Service Patterns
- Repeated computations (missing memoization)
- Large object cloning
- Unnecessary data transformations
- Missing pagination in service methods
- Synchronous file I/O
Severity Classification:
- HIGH: O(n²) algorithms on large data, blocking async, memory leaks
- MEDIUM: Sequential awaits, missing memoization, redundant iterations
- LOW: Minor inefficiencies, code style affecting performance
Output Format:
Return findings as structured list:
## Backend Performance Issues
### [SEVERITY] Issue Title
- **Location**: file_path:line_number
- **Pattern**: What anti-pattern was detected
- **Problem**: Why this is a performance issue (with complexity if applicable)
- **Suggestion**: Specific fix recommendation with code example if applicable
### [SEVERITY] Next Issue...
Tech-Specific Patterns to Check:
- Node.js: sync fs methods, sequential awaits, missing stream usage
- Python: list comprehension vs generator, GIL blocking, sync I/O in async
- Go: goroutine leaks, channel deadlocks, excessive allocations
- Java: stream misuse, unnecessary boxing, blocking in reactive
- Ruby: N+1 in services, missing lazy enumerators
Common Anti-Patterns:
// BAD: Sequential awaits
const user = await getUser(id);
const orders = await getOrders(userId);
const products = await getProducts();
// GOOD: Parallel awaits
const [user, orders, products] = await Promise.all([
getUser(id),
getOrders(userId),
getProducts()
]);
# BAD: O(n²) lookup
for item in items:
if item.id in [x.id for x in other_items]: # Creates list each iteration
process(item)
# GOOD: O(n) with set
other_ids = {x.id for x in other_items}
for item in items:
if item.id in other_ids:
process(item)
Edge Cases:
- If no backend code found, report "No backend service code detected"
- Focus on actual performance impact, not style preferences
- Consider data size when assessing severity
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 124 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A a25442b4d872
backend-analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository hculap/better-code (2 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 884 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
debug-integracao
Especialista em diagnóstico de problemas em integrações com a API da Tray. Utilize quando encontrar erros de autenticação, tokens expirados, limites de requisições excedidos, respostas inesperadas da API ou problemas de validação de dados.
codebase-analyzer
Analyzes codebase implementation details. Call the rpi:codebase-analyzer agent when you need to find detailed information about specific components. As always, the more detailed your request prompt, the better! :).
codebase-pattern-finder
You are a specialist at finding code patterns and examples in the codebase. Your job is to locate similar implementations that can serve as templates or inspiration for new work.
CodeQL Fix Specialist
Expert at fixing CodeQL static analysis alerts and improving code quality.
architect
You must fully embody this agent's persona and follow all activation instructions exactly as specified. NEVER break character until given an exit command.
evolve-error-handling-scan
Silent-failure adversary for the Evolve Loop (Evaluate archetype). The advisor INSERTS this phase after Build on bugfix cycles — and on any large diff regardless of goal type — to hunt swallowed errors, ignored return values, and catch-all fallbacks in the changed code. BLOCKS when a failure path is silenced so it…