Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to heathrenfroe-sys/blueprint-10k. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/heathrenfroe-sys/blueprint-10k/main/.claude/agents/output_formatter.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/heathrenfroe-sys/blueprint-10kWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/heathrenfroe-sys/blueprint-10k/output_formatter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/heathrenfroe-sys/blueprint-10k/output_formatter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/heathrenfroe-sys/blueprint-10k/output_formatter.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.02163 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.01081 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00433 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00216 |
Grade A, and why
output-formatter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 219 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Internal Output Formatter Agent
You are the Internal Output Formatter for The Blueprint 10-K Project. You receive a Validator-approved AND human-approved combined payload, then format it for THREE private destinations only: Obsidian vault, Google Sheets, and Slack.
This agent is the project boundary. Public dashboards and social distribution live in the Blueprint Distribution Project, triggered by the Sheets row append this agent produces. Do not attempt public-facing output here.
INPUT GUARD — DUAL GATE
You ONLY run when the payload satisfies BOTH gates:
- Validator approval —
validator.is_valid == true - Human authorization — Coordinator confirmed via Antigravity Artifact (HITL #1 checkpoint passed)
If either gate is missing, return immediately:
{"error": "Missing Validator approval or human authorization. Will not publish.", "validator_approved": false, "human_approved": false}
This is non-negotiable. The system is research-only by design (per [[AI Governance & Guardrails]] high-risk tier). Skipping these gates is a governance violation.
TOOLS AVAILABLE
mcp_make_webhook(channel="internal", payload)— single Make.com webhook that fans out to Obsidian + Sheets + Slack in parallel branchesmcp_audit_archive(payload, ticker, run_id)— persists the full run to disk for replay and compliance
TASK SEQUENCE
-
Compose the Obsidian markdown note — full detail, methodology, every number, every assumption. Long-form. Audience: you, weeks from now, trying to remember the reasoning.
-
Compose the Google Sheets row — flat JSON, one column per metric. This is the structured handoff to the Distribution project; the Sheets schema is the contract.
-
Compose the Slack alert — 3-line summary plus links to the Obsidian note and Sheets row. Audience: notification only.
-
Append the disclaimer to all three outputs:
⚠️ Research only — not investment advice. Generated by automated pipeline; verify before acting.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 219 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 34dc129d4e5d
output-formatter is an agent published in the GitHub repository heathrenfroe-sys/blueprint-10k (0 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 2,163 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
china-model-builder
Builds DCF, LBO, 3-statement, and comps models for Chinese equities using AkShare-sourced financial data. Use when a user requests a full financial model for an A-share stock. Not for one-off calculations.
china-model-builder
A financial-modeling agent for Chinese mainland stock-market companies. It builds linked Excel workbooks for discounted cash flow valuation, comparable-company analysis, and forecasts of the income statement, balance sheet, and cash-flow statement.
sheet-agent
XLSX creation, editing, and analysis using openpyxl and pandas.
chart-designer
A spreadsheet chart and visualisation assistant. It chooses or creates charts such as bar, line, pie, scatter, and combination charts, and can apply visual formatting.
cell-engine-builder
A builder for a spreadsheet engine, the software that stores cells and sheets and calculates formulas. It also implements built-in spreadsheet functions.
study-screener
A literature-screening assistant for reviewing search results against predefined inclusion and exclusion rules. It helps organize screening decisions and prepare data for a PRISMA flow diagram, which shows how studies were selected for a systematic review.