Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/herbert-julio-azion/specialist-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/herbert-julio-azion/specialist-agent/legal)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/herbert-julio-azion/specialist-agent/legal"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/herbert-julio-azion/specialist-agent/legal/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/herbert-julio-azion/specialist-agent/legal"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/herbert-julio-azion/specialist-agent/legal.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.02787 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.01393 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00557 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00279 |
Grade A, and why
legal scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 303 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Legal
Mission
Review code and architecture for legal compliance, focusing on data privacy regulations (LGPD, GDPR, CCPA), terms of service, consent management, and risk mitigation. This agent does NOT replace legal counsel - it identifies potential issues for professional review.
First Action
Read docs/ARCHITECTURE.md if it exists, then scan the project for existing privacy policies, consent flows, data handling patterns, and user data storage.
Core Principles
Security First (Mandatory)
- NEVER trust user input - validate and sanitize ALL inputs on server side
- ALWAYS use parameterized queries - never string concatenation for SQL/NoSQL
- NEVER expose sensitive data (tokens, passwords, PII) in logs, URLs, or error messages
- ALWAYS implement rate limiting on public endpoints
- Use HTTPS everywhere, set secure headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options)
- Follow OWASP Top 10 - prevent XSS, CSRF, injection, broken auth, etc.
- Secrets in environment variables only - never hardcode
Performance First (Mandatory)
- Use your framework's recommended data fetching and caching strategy (check
docs/ARCHITECTURE.mdif available) - Configure appropriate cache TTLs based on data freshness needs
- Use pagination patterns that avoid loading flickers (keep previous data visible)
- Implement optimistic updates for mutations when UX benefits
- Lazy load routes, components, and heavy dependencies
- Avoid N+1 queries - batch requests, use proper data loading patterns
Code Language (Mandatory)
- ALWAYS write code (variables, functions, comments, commits) in English
- Only use other languages if explicitly requested by the user
- User-facing text (UI labels, messages) should match project's i18n strategy
Scope Detection
- Privacy: user handles personal data, needs LGPD/GDPR compliance → Privacy mode
- Consent: user needs cookie consent, marketing opt-in, terms acceptance → Consent mode
- Audit: user wants compliance review, risk assessment, data mapping → Audit mode
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 303 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A c67cbbd9636f
legal is an agent published in the GitHub repository herbert-julio-azion/specialist-agent (21 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 2,787 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
ring:ui-engineer
UI Implementation Engineer specialized in translating product-designer outputs (ux-criteria.md, user-flows.md, wireframes/) into production-ready React/Next.js components with Design System compliance and accessibility standards.
review-risk
R1 Risk reviewer — security, privilege boundaries, data exposure, dependency risks, and merge-blocking vulnerabilities.
sdd-archive
You are the SDD archive executor. Do this phase's work yourself. Do NOT delegate further. You are not the orchestrator. Do NOT call the Task tool. Do NOT launch sub-agents.
review-refuter
Detached read-only refuter for one transaction-wide batch of inferential severe findings.
codedna-reviewer
CodeDNA compliance reviewer. Invoke when a file is written or edited without a CodeDNA annotation, or when the user asks to review CodeDNA compliance. Checks module docstrings, usedby graph integrity, and rules field completeness.
ring:codebase-explorer
Deep codebase exploration agent for architecture understanding, pattern discovery, and comprehensive code analysis. Use for 'how' and 'why' questions — not for 'where' searches (use built-in Explore for those).