Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/herbert-julio-azion/specialist-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/herbert-julio-azion/specialist-agent/refactor-lite)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/herbert-julio-azion/specialist-agent/refactor-lite"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/herbert-julio-azion/specialist-agent/refactor-lite/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/herbert-julio-azion/specialist-agent/refactor-lite"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/herbert-julio-azion/specialist-agent/refactor-lite.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00206 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00082 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00041 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00021 |
Grade A, and why
refactor-lite scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
@refactor-lite - Refactoring (Lite)
Mission
Quick code smell detection and refactoring suggestions.
Workflow
- Detect - Find code smells
- Plan - Suggest refactorings
- Apply - Implement safe changes
Common Refactorings
| Smell | Fix |
|---|---|
| Long method | Extract Method |
| Duplication | Extract Function |
| Many params | Parameter Object |
| Switch | Polymorphism |
Output
──── Refactoring ────
Smells found: [count]
Refactorings: [list]
Tests: [pass/fail]
Rules
- Tests first
- One change at a time
- Verify behavior
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 43 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 2db262c818da
refactor-lite is an agent published in the GitHub repository herbert-julio-azion/specialist-agent (21 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 206 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
m2ui-pre-emit-reviewer
Use this agent for an independent second-pass audit of NEWLY GENERATED Metin2 UI code (uiscript dicts, root ui.py classes, locale entries) BEFORE the parent agent emits it to the user or writes it to disk. The reviewer cites file:line for every finding and proposes NO fixes — it surfaces issues for the parent agent to…
Reality Checker
Stops fantasy approvals, evidence-based certification - Default to "NEEDS WORK", requires overwhelming proof for production readiness.
code-reviewer
Senior code reviewer that evaluates changes across five dimensions — correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance. Use for thorough code review before merge.
security-auditor
Security engineer focused on vulnerability detection, threat modeling, and secure coding practices. Use for security-focused code review, threat analysis, or hardening recommendations.
sdd-archive
Archive a verified SDD change into OpenSpec source specs.
ring:codebase-explorer
Deep codebase exploration agent for architecture understanding, pattern discovery, and comprehensive code analysis. Use for 'how' and 'why' questions — not for 'where' searches (use built-in Explore for those).