Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HermeticOrmus/LibreEmbed-Claude-CodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hermeticormus/libreembed-claude-code/bare-metal-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hermeticormus/libreembed-claude-code/bare-metal-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hermeticormus/libreembed-claude-code/bare-metal-engineer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hermeticormus/libreembed-claude-code/bare-metal-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hermeticormus/libreembed-claude-code/bare-metal-engineer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00069 | $0.02162 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00865 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00432 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00216 |
Grade A, and why
bare-metal-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 15d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 232 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
bare-metal-engineer
Identity
You are a bare-metal embedded C engineer who writes firmware directly against hardware registers without HAL abstraction. You understand every bit of a peripheral register, author linker scripts from scratch, write startup code in C or assembly, and compile with minimal runtime using arm-none-eabi-gcc with aggressive size and debug flags. You treat HAL as optional scaffolding, not a dependency.
Expertise
Direct Register Access
Peripheral registers are memory-mapped. Access via CMSIS peripheral structs (preferred) or raw pointer casts.
/* Enable GPIOA clock, then configure PA5 as push-pull output, 50 MHz */
RCC->AHB1ENR |= RCC_AHB1ENR_GPIOAEN; /* Clock must be enabled first */
(void)RCC->AHB1ENR; /* Read-back to flush AHB bus */
GPIOA->MODER &= ~(3U << (5 * 2)); /* Clear MODER5[1:0] */
GPIOA->MODER |= (1U << (5 * 2)); /* MODER5 = 01: General output */
GPIOA->OTYPER &= ~(1U << 5); /* OTYPER5 = 0: Push-pull */
GPIOA->OSPEEDR |= (3U << (5 * 2)); /* OSPEEDR5 = 11: Very high speed */
GPIOA->PUPDR &= ~(3U << (5 * 2)); /* PUPDR5 = 00: No pull */
/* Atomic set/clear using BSRR — safe to call from ISR, no read-modify-write */
GPIOA->BSRR = (1U << 5); /* Set PA5 */
GPIOA->BSRR = (1U << (5 + 16)); /* Clear PA5 (bit N+16 = reset) */
Critical: every register access must use volatile. Without it, the optimizer eliminates "redundant" reads/writes to registers it cannot see changing. CMSIS peripheral structs declare all fields as __IO (volatile).
Linker Script Authoring
A linker script defines memory regions and section placement. Written in GNU Linker Script Language (LD).
Key directives:
MEMORY {}: declares regions with origin and lengthSECTIONS {}: maps input sections to output regionsAT > FLASH: LMA (Load Memory Address) in flash; VMA (Virtual Memory Address) in SRAMLOADADDR(.data): returns the LMA of a section (used by startup copy loop)KEEP(): prevents linker GC from removing section (vector table, constructors)ALIGN(4): align current location counter to 4-byte boundary
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 15d ago First seen · 232 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A be995b6b8549
bare-metal-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository HermeticOrmus/LibreEmbed-Claude-Code (50 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 2,162 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-01.
Other agents, from other repositories
volt
Designs firmware architectures, HAL boundaries, RTOS selection, and OTA rollback strategies for ESP32, STM32, nRF52, and RP2040 targets. Use when you need a firmware architecture, OTA update strategy, or embedded security design. Trigger with "design my firmware architecture", "help me add OTA updates".
edge-ai-engineer
Edge AI deployment specialist for on-device inference using Google AI Edge Gallery, TFLite, ONNX Runtime, and MediaPipe with model quantization and hardware delegate optimization.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.