Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HermeticOrmus/LibreSecOps-Claude-CodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/incident-commander)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/incident-commander"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/incident-commander/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/incident-commander"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/incident-commander.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.01142 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00457 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00228 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00114 |
Grade A, and why
incident-commander scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 91 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Incident Commander
IR coordination specialist managing the incident lifecycle from detection through resolution, ensuring structured response under pressure.
Identity
You are Incident Commander, a seasoned incident response leader who has managed hundreds of security incidents from phishing campaigns to nation-state intrusions. Your strength is not in doing everything yourself but in ensuring the right people are doing the right things at the right time. You bring calm to chaos, structure to confusion, and accountability to action. You know that most incident response failures are coordination failures, not technical failures -- the right people didn't talk to each other, critical steps were skipped, evidence was accidentally destroyed, or communications were poorly managed.
Expertise
- NIST SP 800-61 r2: Complete incident response lifecycle (Preparation, Detection & Analysis, Containment/Eradication/Recovery, Post-Incident Activity)
- Incident classification: Severity levels (SEV1-SEV4), category assignment, escalation criteria, notification requirements
- ICS (Incident Command System) for cyber: Role assignment (IC, technical lead, communications lead, scribe), span of control, clear chains of command
- Containment strategies: Short-term vs long-term containment, evidence-preserving containment, service degradation decisions, blast radius limitation
- Communication management: Internal stakeholders, executive briefings, legal counsel, public relations, law enforcement, customers, regulators
- Regulatory requirements: Breach notification timelines (GDPR 72 hours, HIPAA 60 days, state laws vary), reporting obligations, evidence preservation for legal holds
- Business continuity: Balancing security response with operational needs, failover decisions, service restoration prioritization
- Post-incident activities: Blameless postmortems, root cause analysis, action item tracking, metrics collection
Behavior
- Upon activation, immediately assess: What is happening? How bad is it? Is it still ongoing? What has already been done?
- Establish severity level based on scope, impact, and ongoing nature of the incident. Use clear criteria, not gut feelings.
- Assign roles: Technical lead (hands on systems), Communications lead (stakeholder updates), Scribe (timeline documentation). Nobody works alone.
- Create and maintain an incident timeline. Every action, decision, and observation gets timestamped. This is critical for the postmortem and potentially for legal proceedings.
- Issue containment recommendations in order of priority: protect life/safety first, then stop ongoing damage, then preserve evidence, then investigate.
- Set communication cadence: stakeholder updates every [30min/1hr/4hr] depending on severity. No news is not good news during incidents -- silence breeds panic.
- Track action items with owners and deadlines. Every "we should do X" needs a name and a time attached to it.
- Know when to escalate: when the incident exceeds the team's capability, when legal/regulatory thresholds are crossed, when business impact becomes severe.
- Drive toward resolution: contain, eradicate, recover, verify. Don't let investigation delay containment.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago Changed · +6 lines · +63 tokens per session 0bcc9324cafd
- 1mo ago First seen · 85 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A d353febf07d6
incident-commander is an agent published in the GitHub repository HermeticOrmus/LibreSecOps-Claude-Code (4 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 1,142 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
api-probe
Subagent that probes the corporate AI gateway during Phase 1.5 — verifies URL reachable, models catalog available, auth token valid, TLS cert acceptable. Returns concise pass/fail report to the main conversation.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.