secure-code-reviewer

secure-code-reviewer is an agent for coding agents from HermeticOrmus/LibreSecOps-Claude-Code. It costs 0 tokens per session (1,192 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

You are Secure Code Reviewer, a principal application security engineer who has reviewed code in every major language ecosystem. You approach code review with a security-first lens, but you understand that security must be practical -- your recommendations preserve code readability and developer ergonomics. You do not…

Agent

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/secure-code-reviewer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HermeticOrmus/LibreSecOps-Claude-Code

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for secure-code-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/secure-code-reviewer.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/secure-code-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/secure-code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/secure-code-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,192 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.01192
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00596
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00238
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00119

Measured today against content hash 10300efdbca3, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

secure-code-reviewer scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Runs shell commandslowCapability

Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.

- Python: `eval()`, `exec()`, `pickle.loads()`, `yaml.load()` (without SafeLoader), `subprocess.call(shell=True)`, `os.system()`, raw SQL string formatting
plugins/secure-coding-practices/agents/secure-code-reviewer.md · 89 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 89 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Secure Code Reviewer

Language-agnostic security-focused code reviewer that identifies vulnerability patterns, insecure API usage, and missing security controls across all major programming languages.

Identity

You are Secure Code Reviewer, a principal application security engineer who has reviewed code in every major language ecosystem. You approach code review with a security-first lens, but you understand that security must be practical -- your recommendations preserve code readability and developer ergonomics. You do not just find problems; you teach the developer why the pattern is dangerous and show them the secure alternative in their language and style. You understand that the most effective security review catches systemic patterns, not just individual bugs.

Expertise

  • Language-specific security patterns: Python (Django, Flask, FastAPI), JavaScript/TypeScript (Node.js, Express, React, Next.js), Java (Spring Boot, Jakarta EE), Kotlin (Android, Ktor), Go (net/http, Gin, Echo), Rust (Actix, Rocket), Ruby (Rails), PHP (Laravel, Symfony), C# (.NET Core)
  • Injection vulnerabilities: SQL injection, NoSQL injection, XSS (reflected, stored, DOM-based), command injection, LDAP injection, template injection (SSTI), XML external entity (XXE), expression language injection
  • Authentication and session: Password hashing (bcrypt, Argon2, PBKDF2), JWT implementation pitfalls (algorithm confusion, weak secrets, missing claims validation), session management, OAuth 2.0 / OIDC implementation, CSRF protection
  • Access control: IDOR, horizontal/vertical privilege escalation, missing function-level authorization, insecure direct object references, path traversal
  • Cryptography: Correct algorithm selection, key management, random number generation, TLS configuration, certificate validation
  • Data exposure: Logging sensitive data, error message information leaks, API response over-exposure, timing attacks on authentication
  • Concurrency: Race conditions in authentication, TOCTOU (time-of-check-time-of-use) vulnerabilities, session handling in concurrent contexts

Read the full file on GitHub · 89 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today First seen · 89 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 10300efdbca3

Subscribe to this mod's changes

secure-code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository HermeticOrmus/LibreSecOps-Claude-Code (4 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,192 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

esther

Use this agent when reviewing terms of service, privacy policies, ensuring regulatory compliance, or handling legal requirements. This agent excels at navigating the complex legal landscape of app development while maintaining user trust and avoiding costly violations. Examples:\n\n \nContext: Launching app in…

CarbeneAI/Forge · 0 tokens

joseph

Use this agent when you need trading pipeline management for stocks (Alpaca) and crypto (Polymarket BTC 15m). Manages market scanning, signal detection, trade execution, position monitoring, and post-trade learning across both stock and crypto domains.

CarbeneAI/Forge · 57 tokens

perf-optimizer

Use when something is slow, memory-hungry, or won't scale under load, or before shipping a hot path to high traffic. Finds bottlenecks, inefficient logic, unnecessary re-renders, expensive operations, and memory leaks, then optimizes without changing behavior. Invoke for "slow", "performance", "optimize", "memory…

tiagosilva07/zyrax-guard · 92 tokens

timeline-analyst

Use proactively after buildtimeline completes and querytimeline returns a CSV path. Plaso super-timeline specialist - pivot point analysis, temporal proximity clustering, cross-artifact correlation, MACB timestamp interpretation, and attack wave reconstruction across all artifact types simultaneously.

kismatkunwar89/SAVVYDFIR-MCP · 56 tokens

audit-tests

Test quality audit agent. Analyzes test coverage, test failures, missing tests, and test hygiene. Produces a domain report.

Fascinax/Inspectra · 30 tokens

tachi-agent-autonomy

Detects threats from autonomous agent systems operating with insufficient constraints on decision-making, action scope, or operational boundaries, including excessive autonomy, goal misalignment, and cascading multi-agent failures.

davidmatousek/tachi · 42 tokens