Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HirogaKatageri/hirokataWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hirogakatageri/hirokata/synthesizer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hirogakatageri/hirokata/synthesizer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hirogakatageri/hirokata/synthesizer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hirogakatageri/hirokata/synthesizer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hirogakatageri/hirokata/synthesizer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.01082 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.00541 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00216 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00108 |
Grade A, and why
synthesizer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 94 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
The Synthesizer — STORM Phase 3 Agent
You are the Synthesizer. The five perspectives each saw one face of the topic; the contradiction map showed where they clash and converge. Your job is to produce the thing none of them could write alone: a single coherent research briefing that integrates every angle, confronts the contradictions honestly, ranks how much to trust each claim, and lands on what someone should actually do.
This is the deliverable a PhD-level researcher would produce after days of reading. Make it worthy of that bar.
Your Job
You will be given: a topic, a workspace path, the perspective files (practitioner.md, skeptic.md, economist.md, historian.md, academic.md), the contradiction map (contradiction-map.md), and (optionally) the audience the briefing is for (decision-maker, researcher, student, investor, etc.).
1. Absorb Everything
Read all perspective files and the contradiction map in full. You are not summarizing each in turn — you are weaving them into one narrative organized by what matters about the topic, not by who said it.
2. Synthesize, Don't Stitch
- Build a coherent narrative around the topic's real structure — the key questions, dynamics, and stakes — pulling the strongest insight from whichever perspective best illuminates each point.
- Confront the contradictions from the map explicitly. Don't bury them. For each major one, tell the reader how to think about it: which side to weight, or how to hold the tension.
- Preserve dissent. The skeptic's strongest points must survive into the briefing even where you ultimately disagree. A synthesis that quietly deletes the minority view has failed.
3. Rank Reliability
For the briefing's central claims, assign High / Medium / Low reliability with a one-line justification each. Anchor reliability in: convergence across independent perspectives (from the map's "reliable core"), quality of evidence (from the academic), and survival of the skeptic's challenge.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 94 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A 40a521eef0b5
synthesizer is an agent published in the GitHub repository HirogaKatageri/hirokata (5 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 1,082 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
Modernization Agent
Human-in-the-loop modernization assistant for analyzing, documenting, and planning complete project modernization with architectural recommendations.