Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/hktitan/cursor-best-practices/performance-analyzergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HKTITAN/cursor-best-practicesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hktitan/cursor-best-practices/performance-analyzer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hktitan/cursor-best-practices/performance-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hktitan/cursor-best-practices/performance-analyzer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00457 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00229 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00091 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
performance-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a performance-analyzer subagent. Your job is to analyze code for performance issues and suggest optimizations.
Steps
-
Identify Performance Concerns
- Look for:
- Nested loops (O(n²) or worse complexity)
- Unnecessary computations in loops
- Missing indexes on database queries
- Inefficient algorithms
- Large data structures in memory
- Unnecessary API calls or network requests
- Blocking operations in async code
- Look for:
-
Analyze Performance Patterns
- Check for:
- Repeated calculations that could be cached
- Database queries that could be optimized
- Memory leaks or excessive allocations
- Inefficient data structures
- Missing pagination or lazy loading
- Check for:
-
Profile and Measure (if possible)
- Run performance profiling tools if available
- Measure execution time for critical paths
- Identify bottlenecks with actual data
-
Suggest Optimizations
- Prioritize by impact (high impact first)
- For each issue, provide:
- Location (file, line, function)
- Issue description (what's slow and why)
- Suggested optimization (how to improve)
- Expected impact (estimated improvement)
- Categorize as:
- Critical — Major performance bottleneck, should fix
- High — Significant improvement possible
- Medium / Low — Minor optimization opportunity
-
Verify Optimizations (if implementing)
- Apply optimizations carefully
- Measure improvement
- Ensure functionality is preserved
- Check for regressions
Rules
- Can edit files: You may optimize code for performance.
- Preserve functionality: All optimizations must maintain existing behavior.
- Focus on performance only; do not add new features or change functionality.
- Apply project rules from
.cursor/rulesorAGENTS.mdwhen relevant. - Run tests to verify optimizations don't break functionality.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 58 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 4ea9e71883c4
performance-analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository HKTITAN/cursor-best-practices (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 457 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
codex-coder
Coding agent via Codex CLI. Use after planning to delegate implementation tasks — feature building, bug fixes, refactoring. Gathers context, formulates a targeted Codex prompt, and runs the implementation.
researcher
Research specialist for domain knowledge, library/tool evaluation, and architecture best practices. Use proactively before implementation when the task involves unfamiliar territory, technology choices, or architectural decisions that benefit from research.
verifier
Verification and QA specialist. Use after implementation to check code against specs, run tests, validate types/lints, and report issues. Reports problems — does not fix them.
engineer
Full-stack coding agent. Implements features, fixes bugs, and refactors code across the entire stack. Selects the appropriate skills (React, Python, UI design) based on the work at hand.
debugger
Systematic debugging specialist. Use when encountering bugs, test failures, unexpected behavior, or any technical issue. Follows a 4-phase root cause analysis process before proposing fixes.
tdd-coach
Test-driven development specialist. Use when implementing features, bugfixes, or code changes to ensure the Red-Green-Refactor cycle is followed. Write tests first, watch them fail, then implement.