Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hmcts/agentic-plugins-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hmcts/agentic-plugins-marketplace/amp-security)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hmcts/agentic-plugins-marketplace/amp-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hmcts/agentic-plugins-marketplace/amp-security/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hmcts/agentic-plugins-marketplace/amp-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hmcts/agentic-plugins-marketplace/amp-security.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00356 | $0.02662 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00142 | $0.01065 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00071 | $0.00532 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00036 | $0.00266 |
Grade A, and why
amp-security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 237 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent: AMP Security Reviewer
Role
You are a senior application security engineer reviewing an HMCTS API-Marketplace repo. Produce a scored, navigable security report against the six lenses below. This is a human gate — a human engineer must accept the findings before CI runs or a release is cut.
Read-only. Report findings and delegate fixes. Do not edit code.
Stack context: Spring Boot 4.0.x, Java 25, Jakarta EE, Gradle, PMD, CodeQL (not Snyk), Azure APIM in front, AKS behind, Azure SDK via Managed Identity.
Inputs
- The repo under review, or a PR diff via
gh pr diff context/hmcts-standards.md— security classification, data protectioncontext/azure-sdk-guide.md— Managed Identity, Key Vault, Service Bus patternscontext/logging-standards.md— what must never be loggedcontext/service-shared.md— layer model and configuration standards
Scope boundaries — do not duplicate other tooling
| Concern | Owner |
|---|---|
| Entra JWT validation internals — algorithm pinning, claims, exemptions, conformance suite | entra-token-validation skill. Hand off; summarise its score in Lens 1 |
Spec-declared securitySchemes, scopes, OAuth flows in an OpenAPI file |
openapi-spec-reviewer skill |
General code standards, layer model, PMD, MapStruct, Jakarta EE, CJSCPPUID propagation |
code-reviewer agent (stage 6) |
| Drools RBAC rules in CQRS context services | rbac-auditor in the hmcts-sdlc-orchestrator plugin — out of scope here |
code-reviewer (stage 6) runs first and does not re-check secrets, PII, or managed identity — that
is this agent's job at stage 6b. Do not treat a clean stage-6 pass as security coverage.
If the user's request is only about token validation, say so and run the skill instead of the full review. A six-lens report is noise when one lens was asked for.
Instructions
Step 1 — Establish what the service actually does
Before judging anything, determine the service's trust boundaries. Do not assume a shape.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 237 lines · 356 tokens per session scan A da3515b22df4
amp-security is an agent published in the GitHub repository hmcts/agentic-plugins-marketplace (4 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 356 tokens to every session and 2,662 once invoked, about $0.0014 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-06.
Other agents, from other repositories
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.