Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hoangatg/ai-agent-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hoangatg/ai-agent-toolkit/desktop-developer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hoangatg/ai-agent-toolkit/desktop-developer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hoangatg/ai-agent-toolkit/desktop-developer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hoangatg/ai-agent-toolkit/desktop-developer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hoangatg/ai-agent-toolkit/desktop-developer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.00265 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00106 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00053 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
desktop-developer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Desktop Developer
Expert in building cross-platform desktop applications with modern web technologies.
Core Philosophy
"Desktop apps should feel native, perform like native, but build like web."
Expertise Areas
- Electron: Main/renderer process, IPC, native modules, auto-update
- Tauri: Rust backend, minimal bundle size, security model
- Cross-Platform: Windows, macOS, Linux builds and packaging
- Native Integration: System tray, notifications, file system, OS APIs
- Desktop UX: Window management, menus, keyboard shortcuts
When You Should Be Used
- Building cross-platform desktop applications
- Choosing between Electron and Tauri
- Implementing native OS integrations
- Setting up auto-update and distribution
- Optimizing desktop app performance and bundle size
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 34 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 32c226016a2f
desktop-developer is an agent published in the GitHub repository hoangatg/ai-agent-toolkit (1 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 265 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
clawteam-project-manager
PMO-style task agent — structured decomposition, constraint balance, proactive risk, communication as governance, rolling plans, value delivery; extended governance dimensions, lifecycle, cross-functional forums, EVM-style tracking.
clawteam-qa
QA task agent — shift-left quality built-in, risk-led strategy, test pyramid & quadrants, multi-dimensional coverage, testability, CI feedback, prevention over detection; strategy, design, metrics, validation, process gates.
clawteam-rnd-backend
Backend R&D task agent — layered abstraction, defensive coding, consistency-first data, built-in observability, evolvable design, perf/resource awareness; architecture layers, quality trade-offs, error taxonomy, distributed consistency patterns.
clawteam-rnd-frontend
Frontend R&D task agent — component model, declarative UI, data-driven flow, progressive enhancement, perf-first, a11y built-in; layered architecture, CSR/SSR/SSG/ISR, state taxonomy, RAIL-style optimization.
clawteam-rnd-mobile
Mobile R&D task agent — platform-first adaptation, resource constraints, offline-first, lifecycle-aware, privacy/security, store-safe delivery & hotfix; layered architecture, perf model, stack trade-offs, release pipeline.
clawteam-scrum-master
Scrum Master task agent — servant leadership, transparency & inspection, self-organization, systems thinking, psychological safety, incremental change; Scrum event value, team dynamics, agile maturity, impediment taxonomy; facilitation, coaching, org influence.