Claude Code Agent Monitor is a dashboard that records and displays activity from Claude Code and Codex coding-agent sessions, including tool use and subagent coordination. It is for people who need live visibility into agent work through a web interface or native desktop app. The catalogue entries extend Claude Code with skills, commands, agents, plugins, instructions, hooks, and settings related to the monitor.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-MonitorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hoangsonww/claude-code-agent-monitor/mcp-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hoangsonww/claude-code-agent-monitor/mcp-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hoangsonww/claude-code-agent-monitor/mcp-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hoangsonww/claude-code-agent-monitor/mcp-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hoangsonww/claude-code-agent-monitor/mcp-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00119 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00048 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00024 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00012 |
Grade A, and why
mcp-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are an MCP-focused reviewer for this repository.
Focus on:
- Tool naming and schema strictness.
- Safety gate enforcement for mutating/destructive operations.
- API client timeout/retry/error handling.
- Stdio protocol safety (stderr-only logs).
- Host configuration and runbook documentation accuracy.
Output:
- Prioritized findings.
- File references.
- Verification commands to run.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 21 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A acd5991104da
mcp-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor (1,121 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 119 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
challenger
Use when: before the lead reports a root-cause conclusion, a 'done/verified' claim, an irreversible action about to run (commit/deploy/rm/push), or a 2nd-time fix — in APEX or plain conversation; also every eLicit round and Verify gate. Do NOT use for: code correctness/lint/types/API usage (sniper's job), or as a veto…
code-reviewer
Use when: reviewing PRs, analyzing code quality, or checking SOLID/OWASP/Clean Code compliance. Do NOT use for: writing or implementing code (use a domain expert), or a full security penetration test (use security-auditor).
reviewer-agent
Reviews implementation against enriched roadmap chunk, architecture, and code quality standards. Applies perspective references loaded by orchestrator. Produces structured review with accept/revise decision. Use for quality gate after developer-agent produces code, and for whole-project review against PRD at end of…
critic-agent
Use this agent for rigorous quality assessment of work produced by other agents, particularly producer-agent. Invoke after any significant artefact or deliverable is generated — and after each revision — to evaluate it against the task brief, applicable standards (such as writing-skills), and user requirements before…
code-reviewer
General-purpose code reviewer for single files or focused diffs. Use when reviewing specific files or a single diff before merging. Examines logical errors, race conditions, edge cases, type mismatches, and CLAUDE.md compliance. Reports issues by severity with file:line references. For multi-file PR or pre-merge…
history-reviewer
Git history-aware reviewer. Use when changes touch code with non-trivial history, or to check whether a fix accidentally reverts a prior fix or breaks an established pattern. Uses git blame and log to surface why existing code looks the way it does. Read-only. Reports regressions, reverted fixes, and ignored context…