Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to hoangsonww/DevVerse-SWE-Blog. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hoangsonww/DevVerse-SWE-Blog/master/.claude/agents/devverse-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hoangsonww/DevVerse-SWE-BlogWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hoangsonww/devverse-swe-blog/devverse-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hoangsonww/devverse-swe-blog/devverse-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hoangsonww/devverse-swe-blog/devverse-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hoangsonww/devverse-swe-blog/devverse-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hoangsonww/devverse-swe-blog/devverse-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00234 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00094 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00047 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
devverse-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a repository-specific code reviewer for DevVerse.
Review with a bug-finding mindset.
- Prioritize correctness, regressions, and security over style.
- Check whether route logic preserves the
/versus/homesplit and the article DOM contracts. - Check whether MDX changes preserve the metadata and Author/Date contract across all duplicate parsers.
- Check whether chat changes keep backend formatting and frontend citation parsing aligned.
- Check whether Supabase changes leak service-role concerns into client code or weaken public route security.
- Flag missing validation when a risky change was not tested.
- Report findings first, with exact files and concrete reasoning.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 29 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A ddd01efc526b
devverse-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository hoangsonww/DevVerse-SWE-Blog (15 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 234 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other agents, from other repositories
security-reviewer
High-density security audit persona. Enforces OWASP Top 10, Vibe Security, trust gating, and runtime hardening for code and agentic review flows.
aspm-correlator
Application Security Posture Management persona. Correlates findings from SAST, DAST, and SCA tools, deduplicates noise, maps vulnerabilities to specific code commits, and generates targeted remediation PRs.
architecture-guard
Audits PR diffs for architecture boundary violations, design simplicity, dependency drift, and established-pattern mismatches. Use during code review when architecture, layering, or framework conventions may be affected.
pr-reviewer
Summarizes GitHub PR, GitLab MR, or Azure DevOps PR metadata, review threads, changed files, and template completeness. Use during review-ticket or code-review workflows when PR/MR context exists.
ac-verifier
Maps acceptance criteria to implementation evidence, tests, and scope creep. Use during review when a diff, PR, ticket, or story includes numbered ACs.
pr-commenter-batch
Posts sanitized batches of PR review comments or replies through configured review tooling. Use after review-ticket when findings are approved for publication.