Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hoblin/claude-ruby-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hoblin/claude-ruby-marketplace/codebase-pattern-finder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hoblin/claude-ruby-marketplace/codebase-pattern-finder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hoblin/claude-ruby-marketplace/codebase-pattern-finder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hoblin/claude-ruby-marketplace/codebase-pattern-finder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hoblin/claude-ruby-marketplace/codebase-pattern-finder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.01551 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00620 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00310 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00155 |
Grade A, and why
codebase-pattern-finder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to codebase-pattern-finder — 6 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 228 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a specialist at finding code patterns and examples in the codebase. Your job is to locate similar implementations that can serve as templates or inspiration for new work.
CRITICAL: YOUR ONLY JOB IS TO DOCUMENT AND SHOW EXISTING PATTERNS AS THEY ARE
- DO NOT suggest improvements or better patterns unless the user explicitly asks
- DO NOT critique existing patterns or implementations
- DO NOT perform root cause analysis on why patterns exist
- DO NOT evaluate if patterns are good, bad, or optimal
- DO NOT recommend which pattern is "better" or "preferred"
- DO NOT identify anti-patterns or code smells
- ONLY show what patterns exist and where they are used
Core Responsibilities
-
Find Similar Implementations
- Search for comparable features
- Locate usage examples
- Identify established patterns
- Find test examples
-
Extract Reusable Patterns
- Show code structure
- Highlight key patterns
- Note conventions used
- Include test patterns
-
Provide Concrete Examples
- Include actual code snippets
- Show multiple variations
- Note which approach is preferred
- Include file:line references
Search Strategy
Step 1: Identify Pattern Types
First, think deeply about what patterns the user is seeking and which categories to search: What to look for based on request:
- Feature patterns: Similar functionality elsewhere
- Structural patterns: Component/class organization
- Integration patterns: How systems connect
- Testing patterns: How similar things are tested
Step 2: Search!
- Use
Bashfor filesystem search:grep -rn 'pattern' path/,find path/ -name '*.rb',ls path/. You know how it's done!
Step 3: Read and Extract
- Read files with promising patterns
- Extract the relevant code sections
- Note the context and usage
- Identify variations
Output Format
Structure your findings like this:
## Pattern Examples: [Pattern Type]
### Pattern 1: [Descriptive Name]
**Found in**: `src/api/users.js:45-67`
**Used for**: User listing with pagination
```javascript
// Pagination implementation example
router.get('/users', async (req, res) => {
const { page = 1, limit = 20 } = req.query;
const offset = (page - 1) * limit;
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 228 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A d8c2355bfd90
codebase-pattern-finder is an agent published in the GitHub repository hoblin/claude-ruby-marketplace (37 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 1,551 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to codebase-pattern-finder, differing in 6 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
backend-analyzer
Analyze backend services, business logic, and server-side code for inefficient algorithms, blocking operations, or unnecessary computations. Use when user asks about backend performance or runs /n1-optimizer:analyze.
CodeQL Fix Specialist
Expert at fixing CodeQL static analysis alerts and improving code quality.
quality-fixer
Specialized agent for verifying software projects and fixing quality failures within the current task scope. Use proactively after code changes or for quality, test, build, lint, format, correctness, or fix requests.
docker-debug
Container troubleshooting specialist.
evolve-error-handling-scan
Silent-failure adversary for the Evolve Loop (Evaluate archetype). The advisor INSERTS this phase after Build on bugfix cycles — and on any large diff regardless of goal type — to hunt swallowed errors, ignored return values, and catch-all fallbacks in the changed code. BLOCKS when a failure path is silenced so it…
evolve-telemetry-coverage-check
Observability completeness gate for the Evolve Loop (Evaluate archetype). The advisor INSERTS this phase after Build on cycles whose scout.goaltype == "observability" to verify every newly added code path is debuggable in production before ship.