Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/huangjia2019/claude-code-engineeringWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/huangjia2019/claude-code-engineering/bug-fixer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/huangjia2019/claude-code-engineering/bug-fixer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/huangjia2019/claude-code-engineering/bug-fixer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/huangjia2019/claude-code-engineering/bug-fixer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/huangjia2019/claude-code-engineering/bug-fixer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00392 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00157 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00078 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
bug-fixer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 79 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 91e36ae55724
bug-fixer is an agent published in the GitHub repository huangjia2019/claude-code-engineering (1,136 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 392 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
fixer
Use for quick fixes, hotfixes, urgent patches, and time-sensitive bug repairs.
performance
Performance optimization and profiling. Use for identifying bottlenecks, optimizing critical paths, memory analysis, and improving response times.
debugger
Bug investigation and root cause analysis. Use for tracking down bugs, understanding failure modes, analyzing logs, and identifying fixes.
lsp-investigator
Use this agent when you need deep code understanding across a large codebase, when tracing call chains or type hierarchies would require reading many files, when you need to find all references to a symbol, or when compiler diagnostics would help understand build errors. This agent registers the project with the…
columbo
Root-cause investigator. Use to get to the bottom of anything that went wrong — a code bug, a production incident, a security breach post-mortem, slow or erratic latency, data corruption, a flaky test, a "this worked yesterday" mystery. Reconstructs what actually happened from the evidence and names the true cause…
morpheus
The guide who reveals how a system truly works. Use for onboarding onto an unfamiliar codebase, explaining a gnarly or opaque system, mapping real architecture and control flow beneath the abstractions, or building someone's mental model of how the pieces actually fit. Teaches understanding — reveals the door and…