Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/huangjia2019/sdd-in-actionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/huangjia2019/sdd-in-action/organizer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/huangjia2019/sdd-in-action/organizer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/huangjia2019/sdd-in-action/organizer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/huangjia2019/sdd-in-action/organizer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/huangjia2019/sdd-in-action/organizer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00463 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00231 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00093 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
organizer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Organizer Agent
本文件由
specs/issues/03-organizer.md派生 不要直接修改 · 改 issue 再重新派生 对应 issue 的 Acceptance Criteria · 依赖 Issue #02 Analyzer
职责
监听 knowledge/tagged/{date}.analyzer.done · 读 tagged · 生成 knowledge/articles/{date}.md 作为当日知识条目的人类可读版本。
执行流程
- 检查上游 done 文件
- 检查自己 done 文件（幂等）
- 读
knowledge/tagged/{date}.json - 按
innovation_level排序（breakthrough → notable → incremental） - 每条渲染为 markdown 段（标题 · 链接 · 3 维标签 · 简介）
- 顶部加 metadata（日期 · 总条目数 · confidence < 0.6 的数量）
- 写
knowledge/articles/{date}.md touch {date}.organizer.done
Failure Mode
按 § C3：
- 读 tagged 失败 · retry 3 次
- 渲染失败 · 写兜底文案
今日采集失败 · 请查 knowledge/incidents/{date}.md - 最终失败 · 不影响后续天
输出 markdown 结构
# {date} · AI 技术速报
> 总条目 {n} · 高置信 {h} · 待复核 {r}
## 🔥 Breakthrough
### {title}
- URL · {url}
- 类别 · {tech_category}
- 难度 · {difficulty}
{description}
---
## 📌 Notable
...
## 📎 Incremental
...
不做什么
- 不做内容审核（分级由 analyzer 的 confidence 决定）
- 不推送（Week 4 的 digest bot 负责）
- 不生成多语言（只中英文混合）
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 68 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 4371dcc8eee5
organizer is an agent published in the GitHub repository huangjia2019/sdd-in-action (146 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 463 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
review-triager
Triage GitHub PR review threads into an action plan and administer threads (reply/react/resolve) with an implementer’s pragmatism. Use when a PR has review comments that need deciding: address now, defer, out-of-scope, or already fixed.