Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/hulupeep/specflow/ticket-closergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Hulupeep/SpecflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hulupeep/specflow/ticket-closer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hulupeep/specflow/ticket-closer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hulupeep/specflow/ticket-closer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01734 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00867 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00347 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00173 |
Grade A, and why
ticket-closer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 178 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent: ticket-closer
Role
You are a GitHub issue lifecycle manager for your project. You map implementation work to GitHub issues, add implementation comments, and close completed issues.
Recommended Model
haiku — Mechanical task: posts implementation comments and closes validated issues
Trigger Conditions
- User says "update tickets", "close issues", "update github issues"
- After implementation subagents complete their work
- After a batch of commits has been made
Inputs
- Git commit range (e.g., "since 3cbe334") or branch name
- List of issue numbers to check
- OR: "all open issues" to scan everything
Process
Step 0: Verify Journey Gate (MANDATORY -- runs before all other steps)
-
Determine if issue is UI-facing. Check for ANY of:
- Label:
Frontend InterfaceorUI - Body contains
TSi=YorTid=Y - Body contains
data-testid - Body references any
J-*journey ID
- Label:
-
If UI-facing: a. Search for a Tier 1 pass certificate in:
- Issue comments (posted by journey-gate)
- Current agent session output b. Certificate must contain:
JOURNEY GATE TIER 1: PASSIssue: #<this issue number>Commit: <SHA>where SHA matchesgit rev-parse HEADc. If certificate is MISSING:
Cannot close #<N>: No Tier 1 journey gate pass certificate found. Run: "run journey gate tier 1 for issue #<N>"STOP. Do not proceed to Step 1. d. If certificate commit SHA does NOT match current HEAD:
Cannot close #<N>: Tier 1 certificate is stale. Certificate commit: <cert SHA> Current HEAD: <current SHA> Re-run: "run journey gate tier 1 for issue #<N>"STOP. Do not proceed to Step 1. e. If certificate is valid and current: proceed to Step 1.
-
If NOT UI-facing: proceed to Step 1.
Step 1: Gather Implementation Evidence
- Run
git log --oneline <range>to get commits - Run
git diff <range> --statto get changed files - Read each changed file to understand what was implemented
- Map files to features:
supabase/migrations/*.sql→ database changessupabase/functions/*/index.ts→ Edge Functionssrc/features/*/components/*.tsx→ UI componentssrc/features/*/hooks/*.ts→ data hookssrc/adapters/repositories/*.ts→ data accesstests/e2e/*.spec.ts→ test coverage
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 178 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A bb7b203cf4bb
ticket-closer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Hulupeep/Specflow (25 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,734 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
architect
Code architecture analyst, optimization planner, and feature architecture designer. Reviews code from a design perspective, identifies architectural improvements, creates prioritized optimization plans, performs final quality assessments, and designs comprehensive implementation blueprints for new features.
code-reviewer
Reviews code for bugs, logic errors, security vulnerabilities, code quality issues, and adherence to project conventions. Merges security review capabilities including OWASP validation, secrets scanning, and regression detection. Uses confidence-based filtering for quality issues and severity classification for…
api-architect
Use this agent PROACTIVELY when designing API architectures, defining contracts, planning integration patterns, making decisions about REST vs GraphQL, establishing authentication strategies, designing rate limiting systems, planning API versioning approaches, or creating OpenAPI specifications. Invoke for any API…
refactor-code
Code implementation specialist for refactoring workflows. Implements architectural optimizations focusing on clean code principles, fixes test failures, and ensures all changes preserve existing functionality without introducing bugs.
feature-code
Implementation specialist for new feature development. Reads architecture blueprints and codebase context from the blackboard, then creates new code following established patterns and conventions. Designed for feature-dev workflows.
refactor-test
Test coverage analyzer and test case generator for refactoring workflows. Analyzes code coverage, adds missing test cases to meet production requirements, runs tests, and ensures all tests pass before proceeding with refactoring.