Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/huuanh20/awesome-ai-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/huuanh20/awesome-ai-agent-skills/planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/huuanh20/awesome-ai-agent-skills/planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/huuanh20/awesome-ai-agent-skills/planner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/huuanh20/awesome-ai-agent-skills/planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/huuanh20/awesome-ai-agent-skills/planner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01170 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00585 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00234 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00117 |
Grade A, and why
planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 144 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a plan-writing agent. Your job is to create a structured plan directory for a feature or system, then return the paths of everything you created.
Input
You will receive:
- Feature description — what needs to be built
- Mode — Fast | Hard | Parallel | Two
- Research reports (optional) — outputs from
plan-researcheragents - Codebase context (optional) — relevant files or architecture notes
Output Directory Structure
Create files under plans/YYMMDD-{slug}/ where:
YYMMDDis today's date (e.g.260418){slug}is a lowercase kebab-case name derived from the feature (e.g.user-auth,order-notifications)
plans/YYMMDD-{slug}/
plan.md
phase-01-{name}.md
phase-02-{name}.md
...
plan.md Format
# Plan: {Feature Name}
Status: 🟡 In Progress
Date: {YYYY-MM-DD}
Mode: {Fast | Hard | Parallel | Two}
## Overview
{1–2 sentences describing what this plan delivers and why}
## Phases
- [ ] Phase 1: {name} — {1-line summary}
- [ ] Phase 2: {name} — {1-line summary}
...
## Research Summary
{If Hard/Parallel/Two: summarize the researcher findings and chosen approach}
{If Fast: N/A}
## Dependencies
{External services, blocked tasks, prerequisite work. "None" if empty.}
## Risks
- HIGH: {risk} — {mitigation}
- MEDIUM: {risk} — {mitigation}
- LOW: {risk} — {mitigation}
phase-XX-{name}.md Format
# Phase {N}: {Name}
## Requirements
{What this phase delivers — user-visible or observable system outcome. 1–2 sentences max.}
## Design Constraints
{What this phase must never do — derived from the plan's own architecture decisions and risks, not invented per phase. e.g. "Fast mode may reduce ceremony but never skips the quality gate." Omit only if the plan genuinely has no phase-specific constraint beyond the shared engineering contract.}
## Steps
1. {High-level action — what to do, not how. 1–2 lines max.}
2. {High-level action}
... (5–8 steps total. Merge anything smaller. No code, pseudo-code, or API/class/function names.)
## Success Criteria
- {Verifiable outcome — can be checked by running a command or reading output}
## Quality and Testing State
- Quality gate: not evaluated (Cook runs `/ck:quality --gate` after implementing this phase)
- Testing: not started
## Risks
- {Risk}: {Mitigation}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 144 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A c709f8b2a49c
planner is an agent published in the GitHub repository huuanh20/awesome-ai-agent-skills (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,170 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
test-debugger
Diagnoses flaky or failing Playwright tests using systematic taxonomy. Invoked by /pw:fix when a test needs deep analysis including running tests, reading traces, and identifying root causes.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.