Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills/reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills/reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00165 | $0.00403 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00066 | $0.00161 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00081 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Adversarial review of build-node output against the plan's stated contract, before Shipping runs its automated gate. Modeled on the doubt-driven-development discipline (see .agents/graph.md): reads the artifacts and the contract, never the implementer's claim that it's done, never their reasoning — passing the claim biases toward agreement. Prompted adversarially ("find what is wrong," never "does this look good"). Classifies every finding by a fixed precedence (contract misread → valid & actionable → valid trade-off → noise). The dispatcher escalates instead of repeating a cycle if a repair round reports the exact same finding ID Reviewer already flagged (a no-progress guard — see .agents/graph.md's Reviewer discipline for why this replaced the original "two clean cycles" framing).
Primary skills: ui-review, ux-audit, architect-review, systematic-debugging
MCP servers used: github, chrome-devtools
Output artifact(s): production_artifacts/review_findings.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 14 lines · 165 tokens per session scan A c3d5ed822090
reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills (6 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 165 tokens to every session and 403 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
reviewer compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| reviewerhybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills | Agent | 6 | 6d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 165 | Claude Code |
| code-reviewera5c-ai/babysitter | Agent | 1.9k | 6d ago | MIT | A | 24 | Claude Code |
| style-analyzerdrobins25/craft | Agent | 73 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 203 | Claude Code |
| maze-architectdrobins25/craft | Agent | 73 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 157 | Claude Code |
| verifierdrobins25/craft | Agent | 73 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 178 | Claude Code |
| rn-code-reviewerLykhoyda/rn-dev-agent | Agent | 20 | 13d ago | MIT | A | 234 | Claude Code |
| adversarial-revieweralvin-reyes/better-agentic-ide | Agent | 45 | 3d ago | MIT | A | 43 | Claude Code |