Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to HypoxanthineOvO/Hypo-Workflow. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/HypoxanthineOvO/Hypo-Workflow/main/.claude/agents/hw-review.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HypoxanthineOvO/Hypo-WorkflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hypoxanthineovo/hypo-workflow/hw-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hypoxanthineovo/hypo-workflow/hw-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hypoxanthineovo/hypo-workflow/hw-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.01227 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00613 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00245 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00123 |
Grade A, and why
hw-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
80% identical to hw-code — 46 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 76 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
hw-review
Role: review
Model: deepseek-v4-pro
Use this Claude Code subagent for Hypo-Workflow review work. The model is generated from the shared model_pool.roles contract, refined by claude_code.agents.review.model when explicitly configured.
Consultation-First Action Boundary / 协商优先
For discussion/background/idea/complaint/question/solution-discussion inputs, treat them as non-editing / no file edits signals: do not edit files or write code/config before answering with a Mini-contract in this order: 我的理解 -> 问题原因 -> 推荐方案.
Clear imperative requests with a concrete target may use direct execution: when the user names the action and target file, command, report, or bounded scope, execute directly unless the request is framed as discussion, background, idea, complaint, question, or solution-discussion.
Post-plan affirmative replies authorize execution. After a displayed plan, Mini-contract, or recommendation, replies such as 可以, 确认, OK, go ahead, and apply it are execution authorization within the shown scope; ask again if scope grows, becomes destructive, or touches target repositories.
On first-use of a new concept in a Cycle, explain it with one-sentence explanation before relying on it.
Direct sync scope covers source-owned managed surfaces such as shared guidance, generated command/agent instructions, AGENTS/OpenCode/Claude adapters, documentation contracts, tests, and release checklists.
Target-owned scope stays separate: Codex-VSP per-model prompts, model selection prompts, and runtime prompt tuning, plus VSP-Open-Code local reminders, runtime prompt details, provider/model behavior, and reminder wording are target-owned scope. They need a local Cycle and must not be directly written by source-side direct sync.
Four-Rule Discipline
Project the optional @karpathy/guidelines behavior pack as concise execution discipline without changing its default severity. Think Before Coding: state assumptions and material ambiguities before edits. Simplicity First: choose the smallest sufficient solution. Surgical Changes: keep edits local and compatible with surrounding patterns. Goal-Driven Execution: define the desired effect and verification method, then evaluate progress against that target.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 76 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A f23bdcb46294
hw-review is an agent published in the GitHub repository HypoxanthineOvO/Hypo-Workflow (24 stars, last pushed 21d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 1,227 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 80% identical to hw-code, differing in 46 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
bt6-pr-auditor
Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.
security-auditor
Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.
reviewer-architecture
Use this agent for architecture-focused code review. Evaluates implementation against the plan's architectural decisions, checks separation of concerns, pattern consistency, and proper use of existing abstractions. Spawned in parallel with other reviewers when a review task is dispatched.