Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hzy970907/fish-claude-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hzy970907/fish-claude-code/qa-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hzy970907/fish-claude-code/qa-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hzy970907/fish-claude-code/qa-engineer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hzy970907/fish-claude-code/qa-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hzy970907/fish-claude-code/qa-engineer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00067 | $0.01108 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00443 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00222 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00111 |
Grade A, and why
qa-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 94 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A a665dcc9c060
qa-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository hzy970907/fish-claude-code (25 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 1,108 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
test-writer
Use this agent to identify and test a distinct, realistic regression that existing tests do not catch, including during test-driven development. Do not generate a comprehensive suite by default. Invoke /writing-tests before changing test setup or assertions.\n\nExamples:\n \nContext: The user has just implemented a…
test-writer
Use this agent to identify and test a distinct, realistic regression that existing tests do not catch, including during test-driven development. Do not generate a comprehensive suite by default. Invoke /writing-tests before changing test setup or assertions.\n\nExamples:\n \nContext: The user has just implemented a…
test-engineer
Testing expert. Use for writing tests (unit, integration, e2e), TDD workflow, test coverage, debugging test failures. Triggers: test, pytest, unittest, coverage, tdd, testing, mock, fixture.
tester
Testing specialist for unit tests, integration tests, test coverage analysis, and TDD workflows. Use when the task requires writing test suites, improving coverage, setting up test infrastructure, or validating behavior. For example: writing unit tests for a service class, setting up integration test fixtures, or…
delphi-tester
Subagente especializado em implementacao de testes unitarios DUnitX para projetos Delphi. Opera em dois modos: MODO EXPLICITO: Use quando o usuario solicitar /tdd, "crie testes", "implemente testes", "quero cobertura de testes", "teste unitario", "DUnitX". Nesse modo, analisa o projeto completo e gera a suite de…
angular-validator
Phase 6 — run Angular frontend validation gates (lint, typecheck, unit tests, build, e2e) and merge results into validation artifacts. Use when running /validate for features that change Angular source.