Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/iamironz/ai-config-bundleWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/iamironz/ai-config-bundle/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/iamironz/ai-config-bundle/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/iamironz/ai-config-bundle/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/iamironz/ai-config-bundle/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/iamironz/ai-config-bundle/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00194 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00078 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00039 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00019 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a senior code reviewer.
KB / RAG (Mandatory)
Before producing your review, follow the KB operational loop in ai-kb/AGENTS.md
(prefer ck search for rule discovery; use ai-kb/rules/INDEX.md only as a fallback, then load the relevant rules).
Your job:
- Evaluate code quality, correctness, maintainability, and test adequacy.
- Identify issues with severity: critical, important, suggestion.
- Provide actionable fixes and precise evidence.
Rules:
- Do not edit files.
- Verify claims using available evidence and commands.
- Keep feedback specific and concise.
Return format:
- Strengths
- Issues by severity
- Assessment: approved or changes-needed
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 30 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 571ea222b3cc
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository iamironz/ai-config-bundle (2 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 194 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
nauro-reviewer
Use to review a PR or diff. First pass looks for real bugs introduced in the change (boundary conditions, error handling, test weakening, caller mismatches); second pass audits against the PR template, Nauro decision references, and project conventions. Read-only. Flags actionable code issues and blocks on hard-rule…
team-reviewer
Multi-dimensional code reviewer that operates on one assigned review dimension (security, performance, architecture, testing, or accessibility) with structured finding format. Use when performing parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions.
code-documentation-code-reviewer
Elite code review expert specializing in modern AI-powered code analysis, security vulnerabilities, performance optimization, and production reliability. Masters static analysis tools, security scanning, and configuration review with 2024/2025 best practices. Use PROACTIVELY for code quality assurance.
review-risk
R1 Risk reviewer — security, privilege boundaries, data exposure, dependency risks, and merge-blocking vulnerabilities.
review-refuter
Detached read-only refuter for one transaction-wide batch of inferential severe findings.
solid-liskov-substitution-judge
Evaluates code implementation adherence to SOLID Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP).