reviewer

reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from iamvonpasion/hashb. It costs 0 tokens per session (632 once invoked), scanned A, original, no licence file.

An independent code-review agent that examines changes on the current branch in a separate context. A branch is a separate line of development in Git.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after writing or modifying code to review a diff and get a separate verdict before release.
Why use it?
Its lack of knowledge about the author’s intentions helps provide a less biased assessment of the changes before shipping.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the hashb plugin — 19 skills, 1 agent shipped together

Good fit Use it after writing or modifying code to review a diff and…

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/iamvonpasion/hashb/reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/iamvonpasion/hashb

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install hashb, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 19 skills, 1 agent.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/iamvonpasion/hashb/reviewer.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/iamvonpasion/hashb/reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/iamvonpasion/hashb/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/iamvonpasion/hashb/reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 632 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.00632
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00316
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00126
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00063

Measured 6d ago against content hash 58a051d03983, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-06, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agents/reviewer.md · 36 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 36 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 58a051d03983

Subscribe to this mod's changes

reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository iamvonpasion/hashb (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), with no licence file. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 632 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

architecture-reviewer

Architecture and design review agent — read-only. Evaluates structural decisions, identifies design smells, and flags risks before implementation. Never modifies code. Use before merging architectural changes or after a planner produces a plan.

FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-plugins · 45 tokens

architect

Use this agent when creating roadmaps, decomposing plans into tasks, making architecture decisions, or breaking down requirements into executable work. Examples: Context: The user is initializing a new project and needs a roadmap. user: "Create a roadmap for building this application" assistant: "I'll dispatch the…

lgbarn/shipyard · 272 tokens

builder

Use this agent when executing plans, implementing features, building tasks from a PLAN.md, or running TDD implementation cycles. This is the primary implementation agent. Examples: Context: A plan has been created and is ready for execution. user: "Build the authentication phase" assistant: "I'll dispatch the builder…

lgbarn/shipyard · 266 tokens

researcher

Use this agent when conducting domain research, evaluating technology options, investigating ecosystem choices, or gathering knowledge for a development phase. Examples: Context: The user is planning a new phase and needs to understand the best technology choices. user: "We need to add real-time notifications — what…

lgbarn/shipyard · 202 tokens

reviewer

Use this agent when performing code review, verifying spec compliance, conducting quality review after a build, or checking that an implementation matches its plan. Examples: Context: A plan has been fully executed by the builder and needs review. user: "Review the authentication implementation" assistant: "I'll…

lgbarn/shipyard · 200 tokens

adversarial-planner

Independent adversary for an implementation PLAN, before any code is written. Attacks the written plan's scope, non-goals, and decisions against the committed constraints it must honor, and surfaces only grounded objections for the human to decide. Never rewrites the plan and never sees the author's reasoning …

jakubsuplicki/codument · 82 tokens