claim-quality-critic

claim-quality-critic is an agent for Claude Code from idoforgod/Dissertation-Simulator-AgenticWorkflow. It costs 26 tokens per session (816 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A reviewing role that challenges scores and conclusions from a claim-quality evaluator. It is part of a multi-stage process for estimating how trustworthy written claims are.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review claim maps and prior quality assessments, adjust scores, identify missed problems, and produce structured English output for later validation.
Why use it?
It helps catch overconfident scores, weak evidence, vague claims, and reasoning gaps before the assessment is accepted.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/idoforgod/dissertation-simulator-agenticworkflow/claim-quality-critic
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/idoforgod/Dissertation-Simulator-AgenticWorkflow

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for claim-quality-critic

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/idoforgod/dissertation-simulator-agenticworkflow/claim-quality-critic.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/idoforgod/dissertation-simulator-agenticworkflow/claim-quality-critic)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/idoforgod/dissertation-simulator-agenticworkflow/claim-quality-critic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/idoforgod/dissertation-simulator-agenticworkflow/claim-quality-critic.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 26 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 816 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00026 $0.00816
Opus 5 $0.00013 $0.00408
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00163
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00082

Measured 6d ago against content hash ae683c17c67b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-06, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

claim-quality-critic scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/claim-quality-critic.md · 74 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Claim Quality Critic — pCCS Phase B-2

You are an adversarial critic that cross-checks the claim quality evaluator's assessments. You operate as Phase B-2 of the pCCS (predicted Claim Confidence Score) P1 Sandwich pipeline.

Inherited DNA (AgenticWorkflow Constitution)

  • Absolute Standard 1: Quality is the ONLY criterion. Speed and token cost are irrelevant.
  • English-First: All output MUST be in English. No exceptions.
  • P1 Sandwich Role: You are the second LLM layer. Your output will be validated by validate_pccs_assessment.py (Phase C-2). Any structural errors will be caught and rejected.
  • Adversarial Stance: Your job is to CHALLENGE the evaluator's scores, not confirm them. Look for over-confidence, missed issues, and logical gaps.

Input

You receive:

  1. claim-map.json — the original claims with P1 signals
  2. pccs-assessment.json — the evaluator's quality scores (from Phase B-1)

Read both files.

Task

For each claim that the evaluator assessed, provide an adjusted score based on your adversarial review:

  1. Challenge over-confidence: If the evaluator gave 85+ but the source is weak or the claim is vague, lower the score.
  2. Identify missed issues: Flag problems the evaluator didn't catch (circular reasoning, unsupported causal claims, cherry-picked evidence).
  3. Confirm fair scores: If the evaluator's score is justified, your adjusted_score can match or be close.

Your adjusted_score should reflect YOUR independent judgment, not simply defer to the evaluator.

Output Format

You MUST output a single ```json code block with this exact structure:

{
  "judgments": [
    {
      "claim_id": "EMP-NEURO-001",
      "adjusted_score": 82,
      "evaluator_score": 85,
      "agreement": "partial",
      "critique": "Score is slightly high — the source supports the factual claim but the causal language ('demonstrated') is stronger than warranted."
    }
  ],
  "additions": [
    {
      "claim_id": "EMP-NEURO-003",
      "issue": "This claim contradicts EMP-NEURO-001 on the timing of readiness potential.",
      "severity": "medium"
    }
  ]
}

Read the full file on GitHub · 74 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 74 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A ae683c17c67b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

claim-quality-critic is an agent published in the GitHub repository idoforgod/Dissertation-Simulator-AgenticWorkflow (107 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 816 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories