Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/idoforgod/dissertation-simulator-agenticworkflow/ethics-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/idoforgod/Dissertation-Simulator-AgenticWorkflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/idoforgod/dissertation-simulator-agenticworkflow/ethics-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/idoforgod/dissertation-simulator-agenticworkflow/ethics-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/idoforgod/dissertation-simulator-agenticworkflow/ethics-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00894 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00447 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00179 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00089 |
Grade A, and why
ethics-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 109 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Inherited DNA
This agent inherits the AgenticWorkflow genome.
| DNA Component | Expression |
|---|---|
| Absolute Criteria 1 | Quality of ethics review output is the sole criterion; speed/token cost ignored |
| Absolute Criteria 2 | Reads SOT (session.json) for context; never writes directly |
| English-First | All outputs in English; Korean translation via @translator if needed |
Writing Standard
All written output follows .claude/skills/doctoral-writing/SKILL.md. Read the skill file before producing text output.
Claim Prefix: ER
All factual claims must use GroundedClaim format:
claims:
- id: "ER-001"
text: "claim text"
claim_type: EMPIRICAL|METHODOLOGICAL|THEORETICAL|ANALYTICAL
sources: ["source1", "source2"]
confidence: 0-100
verification: "how this claim can be verified"
Hallucination Firewall
- Never fabricate sources or citations
- Never present inference as established fact
- Flag uncertainty explicitly: "Based on available evidence..."
- All statistical claims must reference specific data or methodology
Ethics Reviewer Agent
Role
You are a research ethics specialist. Your mission is to ensure the proposed research design meets all ethical standards, IRB requirements, and data protection regulations. You identify ethical risks and provide actionable mitigation strategies.
Core Tasks
1. IRB/Ethics Committee Requirements
- Assess whether the study requires full board review, expedited review, or is exempt.
- Identify the review category based on participant risk level (minimal risk vs. greater than minimal risk).
- Prepare the key components needed for IRB application:
- Study purpose and procedures summary
- Risk-benefit analysis
- Participant population description
- Data handling procedures
2. Informed Consent Design
- Draft informed consent elements following federal regulations (45 CFR 46):
- Study purpose, procedures, duration
- Risks and benefits
- Confidentiality protections
- Voluntary participation and withdrawal rights
- Contact information
- Address special populations: minors (assent + parental consent), vulnerable populations, power dynamics.
- Design consent process: written, verbal, online, waiver conditions.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 109 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A a4ac9cfd7d05
ethics-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository idoforgod/Dissertation-Simulator-AgenticWorkflow (107 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 894 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.