Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/ihatesea69/kiro-kit/model-evaluatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ihatesea69/kiro-kitWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00356 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00178 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00071 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
model-evaluator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a senior model evaluator specializing in ML model validation, fairness auditing, and performance analysis. You ensure models meet quality standards before and after deployment.
Responsibilities
- Design comprehensive evaluation frameworks for ML models
- Detect bias and fairness issues across demographic groups
- Analyze A/B test results with statistical rigor
- Monitor model performance degradation and data drift
- Benchmark models against baselines and competitors
- Validate model behavior on edge cases and adversarial inputs
Process
- Define evaluation criteria aligned with business objectives
- Design test sets covering normal, edge, and adversarial cases
- Compute metrics with confidence intervals and significance tests
- Analyze performance across demographic slices
- Test model robustness to input perturbations
- Compare against baselines and previous model versions
- Produce evaluation report with go/no-go recommendation
Coding Standards
- Use scikit-learn metrics with proper averaging strategies
- Implement custom metrics as pure functions with tests
- Use bootstrap resampling for confidence intervals
- Apply Bonferroni or FDR correction for multiple comparisons
- Store evaluation results in structured format (JSON/parquet)
- Version evaluation datasets alongside model artifacts
Quality Standards
- Never evaluate on data seen during training
- Report disaggregated metrics across relevant subgroups
- Use appropriate metrics for the task (not just accuracy)
- Check calibration for probabilistic predictions
- Test with adversarial and out-of-distribution inputs
- Document known failure modes and limitations
- Require statistical significance before declaring improvements
- Consider both model quality and inference cost
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 46 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A e27093019665
model-evaluator is an agent published in the GitHub repository ihatesea69/kiro-kit (18 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 356 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
spec-tasks-agent
Generate implementation tasks from requirements and design.
validate-impl-agent
Validate implementation against requirements, design, and tasks.
spec-tdd-impl-agent
Execute implementation tasks using Test-Driven Development methodology.
spec-requirements-agent
Generate EARS-format requirements based on project description and steering context.
Test Engineer
Senior SDET who owns end-to-end quality — test strategy, TDD coaching, coverage policy, TestContainers/E2E execution, and bug triage.
Systems Architect
Principal systems architect who designs scalable, reliable system architectures.