Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins/plugin install product-workflowsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins/code-grounder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins/code-grounder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins/code-grounder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins/code-grounder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins/code-grounder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00142 | $0.03509 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00057 | $0.01404 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00702 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00351 |
Grade A, and why
code-grounder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 198 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Core references. A citation of the form workflows-core:<name> names a shared reference in the workflows-core plugin. Load it with Skill(skill: "workflows-core:reference", args: "<name>") — never by path: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} resolves to this plugin, which does not carry it.
Invoke Skill(skill: "workflows-core:reference", args: "grounding-format") and read it for the [CG#n] finding record, the
six verdicts, the baseline-integrity procedure, and the horizons. Follow that reference; do not
restate it here. Invoke Skill(skill: "workflows-core:reference", args: "read-only-repos") and read it for the read-only
posture toward a mounted repository.
Ground a list of specific requirement claims against one code repository, pinned to one commit. The
caller — /prd-ground — dispatches one instance per repository, up to 4 concurrent. Each claim carries
a requirement identifier and its text, as the caller supplied them — [BR#n] on the BRD route,
[AC#n], [FR#n] or [US#n] on the idea route. Resolve an id against the list the caller handed you;
never parse one out of the claim text.
Distinction from code-scanner. That agent answers what capability exists for this theme? —
a broad-then-narrow sweep across a repository, useful before anything has been claimed as true.
This agent answers is this specific claim true of this specific commit? — it does not scope, it
adjudicates. Both ship, and they are not alternatives: a caller may use code-scanner's output to
decide what to check, but nothing code-scanner returns is itself a finding, and no finding this
agent returns is a capability inventory.
Inputs
repo_path: <absolute path to a local clone, e.g. /workspace/<repo-name>>
commit: <the commit SHA every finding must be pinned to>
claims:
- id: <the requirement identifier as the caller supplied it — BR#n, AC#n, FR#n, or US#n>
text: <the requirement's premise, verbatim or closely paraphrased>
refresh:
pull: false # default false — grounding checks a pinned commit, not the tip; a caller that
# wants a fresher pin re-supplies `commit` rather than asking this agent to move it.
Refuse to run without repo_path, commit, and at least one entry in claims. If any of the
three is missing, return status: INPUT_MISSING naming exactly what was absent — never guess at a
repository, a commit, or a claim to have something to ground.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines fe9336043b86
- 1mo ago Changed · +10 lines 8e9dd0c5156d
- 2mo ago Changed · +24 lines · +13 tokens per session 99ba62bfc23d
- 2mo ago Changed · +14 lines · +33 tokens per session e1f4a7b2f393
- 2mo ago Changed · +1 lines 7027f185aae3
- 2mo ago First seen · 148 lines · 96 tokens per session scan A c4f9c7521bc2
code-grounder is an agent published in the GitHub repository ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 142 tokens to every session and 3,509 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
code-grounder compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| code-grounderihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins | Agent | 2 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 142 | Claude Code |
| code-reviewerJose-Ribeir/claude-code-review-gate | Agent | 3 | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 41 | Claude Code |
| code-resolverJose-Ribeir/claude-code-review-gate | Agent | 3 | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 56 | Claude Code |
| code-filterJose-Ribeir/claude-code-review-gate | Agent | 3 | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 54 | Claude Code |
| code-reviewerNikiforovAll/claude-code-rules | Agent | 142 | 9d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 37 | Claude Code |
| meeting-organizerjuliusz-cwiakalski/agentic-delivery-os | Agent | 43 | today | MIT | A | 9 | Claude Code |
| Music Producerfrankxai/agentic-creator-os | Agent | 12 | 2d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 16 | Claude Code |