guideline-reviewer

guideline-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins. It costs 71 tokens per session (3,675 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A reviewer for application code and user interfaces that checks public design-system and accessibility rules. Accessibility rules help people with disabilities use an application.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing headers, tables, filters, connections, permissions, settings, dashboards, terminology, data naming, and WCAG accessibility compliance.
Why use it?
It identifies interface patterns, wording, data names, and accessibility problems that may conflict with the required standards.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} variable.

Runs only inside its plugin — its command needs a path that Claude Code sets for a plugin’s own hooks and for nothing else. Install the plugin, not this.

Part of the guideline-reviewers plugin — 2 commands, 2 agents shipped together

Good fit Reviewing headers, tables, filters, connections, permissions, settings, dashboards, terminology, data naming, and WCAG accessibility compliance.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins
Claude Code
/plugin install guideline-reviewers

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install guideline-reviewers, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 2 commands, 2 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for guideline-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins/guideline-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins/guideline-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins/guideline-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins/guideline-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for guideline-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins/guideline-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins/guideline-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 71 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 3,675 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00071 $0.03675
Opus 5 $0.00036 $0.01837
Sonnet 5 $0.00014 $0.00735
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00367

Measured 11d ago against content hash da3a78f89e96, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

guideline-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/guideline-reviewers/agents/guideline-reviewer.md · 304 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 304 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

UI Guideline Reviewer

Review app code and UI for compliance with the mandatory UI design-system and accessibility standards.

Quick Reference: Which Guideline Applies?

Component/Pattern Guideline Reference
App header / top app bar, navigation, tabs, help menu, app logo App header references/guidelines/appheader.md
Data table, rows, columns, sorting, selection, pagination Data table references/guidelines/datatable.md
Filter field, filtering, query syntax, suggestions Filter field references/guidelines/filterfield.md
Connection setup, OAuth, API keys, credentials Connections references/guidelines/connections.md
Permission errors, access denied, missing access Permissions references/guidelines/permissions.md
Settings schema, app preferences, configuration Settings references/guidelines/settings.md
Dashboard, tiles, ready-made dashboards Dashboards references/guidelines/dashboards.md
"Alert" vs "notification" terminology Terminology references/guidelines/alerting-terminology.md
Table names, view names, dataset/field naming conventions Data naming references/guidelines/data-naming.md
Accessibility, WCAG, keyboard nav, screen readers Accessibility references/guidelines/accessibility.md

All reference paths are relative to ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}.

Review Workflow

1. Identify Components

Scan the code/UI to identify which UI components are used:

  • Navigation: app header / top app bar, tabs, help menu
  • Data display: data tables, filter fields
  • User flows: connections, permissions, settings
  • Content: dashboards, terminology

2. Load Relevant Guidelines

Load only the references needed for the components found. Do NOT load all references.

3. Run the Deterministic Accessibility Check

Before any LLM review pass, detect and wrap whatever accessibility tooling the target repo already configures — see Deterministic Accessibility Check below for the detection order, what each branch does, and the merge rule. Record the outcome as a11y_check. No tooling detected ⇒ skip silently and continue to step 4 exactly as if this step did not exist.

Read the full file on GitHub · 304 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 304 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A da3a78f89e96

Subscribe to this mod's changes

guideline-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 3,675 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.