Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ihudak/ihudak-claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins/prose-fixer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins/prose-fixer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins/prose-fixer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins/prose-fixer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins/prose-fixer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.01889 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00945 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00378 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00189 |
Grade A, and why
prose-fixer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 172 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Fix prose style violations
Applies automatic corrections to documentation files based on violations reported by
prose-style-checker. Only performs safe, mechanical fixes — anything ambiguous is
skipped and reported back for human review.
The active rule set (shipped baseline, plus an organization overlay when one is
configured) is resolved by prose-style-checker, not here. This agent applies the
suggestion field it is handed; it never re-derives a rule and never consults the
reference docs to invent one.
Inputs
The caller provides:
violations: [<array of prose-style-checker violation records>]
files: [<absolute paths of files to fix>]
Each violation record follows the prose-style-checker schema:
file: <absolute path>
line: <line number>
rule: <rule identifier>
severity: BLOCKER | MAJOR | MINOR | NIT
message: <description>
suggestion: <proposed fix>
Fixable categories
The following violation categories can be auto-fixed with high confidence:
| Rule prefix | Fix type | Example |
|---|---|---|
Prose.Terminology.WrongTerm |
Direct replacement | "tenant" → "workspace" |
Prose.Terminology.WrongProductName |
Direct replacement | "Github" → "GitHub" |
Prose.Terminology.DeprecatedTerm |
Direct replacement | "control center" → "admin console" |
Prose.WordList.ExcludedWord |
Direct replacement | "blacklist" → "blocklist" |
Prose.WordList.Patronizing |
Deletion of a single word | "Simply run the script." → "Run the script." |
Prose.WordList.SpellingVariant |
Direct replacement | "behaviour" → "behavior" |
Prose.WordList.WrongCompound |
Direct replacement | "e-mail" → "email" |
Prose.Accessibility.AbleistTerm |
Direct replacement | "crazy" → "unexpected" |
Prose.Accessibility.ExcludedTerm |
Direct replacement | "master" (tech) → "primary" |
Prose.Grammar.AwkwardContraction |
Expansion | "it'll" → "it will" |
Prose.Formatting.NumberSpelling |
Numeral/word swap | "3 options" → "three options" |
Prose.UI.ClickInsteadOfSelect |
Direct replacement | "click" → "select" |
Prose.UI.NavigateInsteadOfGoTo |
Direct replacement | "navigate to" → "go to" |
Prose.UI.LogInInsteadOfSignIn |
Direct replacement | "log in" → "sign in" |
Prose.UI.EnableInsteadOfTurnOn |
Direct replacement | "enable" → "turn on" |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 172 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 2d2c93f24123
prose-fixer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 1,889 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Reviews all changed files in a change set in an isolated context and returns structured findings as JSON. Spawned by the /review-gate:review orchestrator. Not for general questions.
code-filter
Independent falsify pass for review-gate findings. Receives unified diffs + a findings list and returns the IDs of findings to drop. Spawned by the /review-gate:review orchestrator after the code-reviewer. Not for general questions.
lead
Workflow orchestrator. Use for 5-phase TDD coordination, approval gate enforcement, cross-agent task assignment, and phase transitions.
meeting-organizer
Prepare and summarize meeting docs.
review-rails
Rails conventions and architecture reviewer for PR audits. Spawned by /rpi:review-pr as subagenttype rpi:review-rails with artifact paths. Ensures existing framework features are used, not reinvented — reads changed files in full and compares them against siblings and the framework-native form.
Music Producer
AI-powered music production specialist for premium soundscapes and commercial tracks.