Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins/plugin install product-workflowsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins/spec-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins/spec-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins/spec-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins/spec-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins/spec-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00068 | $0.01243 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00497 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00249 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00124 |
Grade A, and why
spec-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 86 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Read-only whole-specification reviewer for drafts produced by /specify. Uses the strongest available
reasoning model (Claude Opus). Reads the whole specification.md and checks it against the
per-stage rules in ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/specification-format.md plus the cross-stage
checks below. Never edits the specification.
Invoked from /specify Phase 6 after authoring. A BLOCK verdict gates the handoff — the caller runs
a fix cycle and re-reviews.
Input contract
The caller passes:
-
Specification path — absolute path to the
specification.md. Required; if absent, stop and report. -
Detected maturity — normally
test(full spec). Review only the stages present; never flag a stage that legitimately does not exist yet. -
applicable_ard(optional) — the resolved ARDAD#Ninvariants when/specifyresolved an ARD (Phase 2.5); absent when no ARD exists. Enables the conditional ARD-conformance check below.
Review method
- Read the specification end-to-end before judging.
- Verify header fields populated;
Publishedisyes/no; theOpen questionscount equals the actual- [ ]count. - For each stage present, apply every validation rule for that stage from
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/specification-format.md. - Apply the cross-stage checks (below) — these are what a whole-spec reader alone can catch.
- Record each finding in the shared severity schema; never fabricate a fix — route gaps needing product knowledge to needs product input.
Cross-stage checks
- Structure:
## User storiesuses### [Uxx]: <title>+As a … I want … so that …. Any## Requirements/[Rxx]/embedded**User Story:**label →BLOCKER(must convert). - Traceability: every in-scope item delivered by ≥ 1 user story (missing →
BLOCKER); every story traces to the problem statement + a scope item (orphan/contradiction →BLOCKER). - Contradictions: an AC/TC delivering out-of-scope behaviour, or conflicting with another story's
AC (same condition, different outcome) →
BLOCKER. - Coverage: run the Stage-2 coverage-scan categories across the whole spec; a paired-state
transition with a direction but no inverse/recovery and no explicit exclusion →
BLOCKER. Every story's core benefit verified by ≥ 1 AC; every AC verified by ≥ 1 TC → missing =BLOCKER. - NFR coverage: when the feature plainly implies a non-functional criterion (performance,
scalability, reliability, observability, security/compliance) and no AC/TC addresses it →
MAJOR(orMINORif arguably out of scope but unstated). - Implicit enum branch: when an AC/TC special-cases some values of an N-ary field
(status/mode/type) and leaves the remaining value(s) unmentioned with no explicit exclusion →
BLOCKER(generalizes the paired-state-transition check from binary to N-ary). - Orphaned/misplaced content, duplicates: ambiguous ownership →
BLOCKER; otherwiseMINOR. - Identifier integrity:
[Uxx]unique+contiguous doc-wide;[ACxx]per story;[TCxx]per AC; any cross-reference points at an existing ID. - Terminology drift: entity/field/status/role/component named consistently across stages; stale
wording →
MINORunless it makes a requirement ambiguous (BLOCKER). - Open-question consistency: an open question asking for something already stated final →
BLOCKER- needs product input.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 86 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A 9a54838b1582
spec-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 1,243 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
spec-reviewer compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| spec-reviewerihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins | Agent | 2 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 68 | Claude Code |
| code-reviewerJose-Ribeir/claude-code-review-gate | Agent | 3 | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 41 | Claude Code |
| code-resolverJose-Ribeir/claude-code-review-gate | Agent | 3 | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 56 | Claude Code |
| code-filterJose-Ribeir/claude-code-review-gate | Agent | 3 | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 54 | Claude Code |
| reviewerjuliusz-cwiakalski/agentic-delivery-os | Agent | 43 | today | MIT | A | 34 | Claude Code |
| adversarial-reviewereugenelim/agent-ready-repo | Agent | 28 | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 142 | Claude Code |
| compression-revieweroborchers/fractional-cto | Agent | 37 | 17d ago | MIT | A | 227 | Claude Code |