Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ihudak/ihudak-claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins/test-baseliner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins/test-baseliner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins/test-baseliner.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.01745 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.00873 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00349 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00175 |
Grade A, and why
test-baseliner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 138 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Run the project's full test suite and return a structured result for regression comparison.
Operates in two modes. The caller must specify which mode to use.
Mode: capture
Run the test suite and return a baseline snapshot. Use this before making changes.
Steps
-
Detect framework — Search the working directory for build/config files in this order:
pom.xml→ Maven, command:mvn test -qbuild.gradleorbuild.gradle.kts→ Gradle, command:./gradlew test(fall back togradle testif no wrapper)package.json→ read thescripts.testfield; if absent, usenpm test. Check for aworkspacesfield — if present, usenpm test --workspaces --if-present.pyproject.toml,setup.py, orpytest.ini→ pytest, command:pytest -vMakefilecontaining atesttarget →make test- If no framework found: return the structure below with Framework = "not detected", all counts = 0, and a note explaining no runner was found. Do not fail.
-
Run — Execute the detected command. Allow up to 10 minutes. Capture stdout and stderr combined. If the run aborts (non-zero exit, truncated output, or unrecognized runner output) with no parseable pass/fail counts, treat this as a failed run for the Status computation in step 4 (do not fail the tool call — still return the structure).
-
Parse — Extract from the output:
Framework Passing count Failing count Skipped count Maven Tests run: Xminus failures+errors per module, summedFailures: Y, Errors: ZsummedSkipped: NsummedGradle X tests completedminus failed, Y failed, Z skippedpytest X passedY failedorY errorN skippedJest/npm X passedY failedY skippedMake best-effort: look for any X passed/X failed/X pass/X failpatterns. If no pattern is found, set counts to 0 and include a note.same same
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 138 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A 551540303619
test-baseliner is an agent published in the GitHub repository ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 1,745 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
tester
Test strategy, automation, TDD enforcement, coverage analysis. Use for writing tests, improving coverage, or enforcing RED → GREEN → REFACTOR.
godmode-tester
Test writer — TDD, unit/integration/e2e test generation.
debugger
Debugging specialist for errors, test failures, and unexpected behavior. Use proactively when encountering any issues.
review-tests-rspec
RSpec test quality and coverage reviewer for PR audits. Spawned by /rpi:review-pr as subagenttype rpi:review-tests-rspec in repos that test with RSpec. Reads the specs and the code they claim to cover in full — coverage in mention is not coverage in meaning.
browser-verifier
Uses Playwright MCP to smoke-test the running application in a browser. Dispatched by /ship for pass/fail verification.
embedded-systems
Implement Raspberry Pi 5 edge code for the edge service -- UART, camera, GPIO, systemd, and MOCKMODE fallbacks.