provider-debugger

A diagnostic guide for compatibility problems between a live provider and coding-agent software, including Kimi, GLM, and other endpoints that follow OpenAI's API format. A provider is the service that supplies the model.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to investigate connection, request, or response failures with supported model providers.
Why use it?
It helps identify why an apparently compatible model service is failing when connected to the harness.

Agent for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/ilearn-lab/evoharness/provider-debugger
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/iLearn-Lab/EvoHarness

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 19 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 92 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00019 $0.00092
Opus 5 $0.00010 $0.00046
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00018
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00009

Measured 2d ago against content hash 490b8e7ab425, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

provider-debugger scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/provider-debugger.md · 13 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 13 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 490b8e7ab425

Subscribe to this mod's changes

provider-debugger is an agent published in the GitHub repository iLearn-Lab/EvoHarness (59 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 92 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

requirements-reviewer

Reviews a draft requirements.md against the conversation history and glean scratch files. Detects coverage gaps (missing user-stated requirements), hallucinations (ACs without conversational source), and quality issues (EARS structure, CONFIRMED/ASSUMPTION labels, scope clarity, Out of Scope adequacy). Triggered…

iroha924/mumei · 99 tokens

security-reviewer

Reviews a Wave's diff for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities introduced in this change. Triggered automatically by /mumei:compose after a Wave is implemented. Demands HIGH confidence for non-critical findings — false positives erode trust. Does NOT cover code quality, spec, or correctness.

iroha924/mumei · 63 tokens

spec-compliance-reviewer

Reviews a Wave's implementation against requirements.md and tasks.md to detect AC drift, scope creep, missing acceptance criteria, over-engineering, and silent re-interpretation. Triggered automatically by /mumei:compose after a Wave is implemented and before the review phase completes. Does NOT review code quality…

iroha924/mumei · 78 tokens

issue-validator

Re-validates a single finding produced by another reviewer with fresh context. Returns valid / invalid / unsure. Triggered by /mumei:compose after the 3 reviewers complete (spec-compliance / security / adversarial) — invoked once per finding in parallel for severity=HIGH/CRITICAL findings. Filters false positives…

iroha924/mumei · 74 tokens

memory-curator

Independent evaluator that scores a candidate memory entry from a reviewer agent against a 7-axis rubric (generality, recurrence, longevity, coveragegap, actionability, density, confidence) and decides ADD / UPDATE / SKIP. Triggered by /mumei:compose Phase 5 Stage 6 and /mumei:peruse after each review-pipeline…

iroha924/mumei · 111 tokens

bash-script-reviewer

Reviews the quality of the mumei plugin's hooks/.sh and hooks/lib/.sh. Checks shellcheck convention compliance, the KISS principle, error handling, consistent mumei prefixing, ${CLAUDEPLUGINROOT} usage, jq null safety, BSD awk compatibility, and the stdin/stdout/stderr separation principle. Use on newly added or…

iroha924/mumei · 119 tokens