rfc

rfc is an agent for Claude Code from ilyasibrahim/claude-agents-coordination. It costs 32 tokens per session (1,576 once invoked), scanned A, original, Unlicense.

A structured design proposal and review process. RFC means “Request for Comments”: a document that explains a problem, a proposed technical solution, alternatives, risks, and how the change will be introduced.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to write a new proposal, review its feasibility and risks, or record whether it was approved, rejected, or needs changes.
Why use it?
It gives stakeholders a shared place to examine an important change before implementation. Decisions, required revisions, and implementation notes are recorded instead of being lost in discussions.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter; names the TodoWrite tool.

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/ilyasibrahim/claude-agents-coordination/rfc
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ilyasibrahim/claude-agents-coordination

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for rfc

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ilyasibrahim/claude-agents-coordination/rfc.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ilyasibrahim/claude-agents-coordination/rfc)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ilyasibrahim/claude-agents-coordination/rfc"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ilyasibrahim/claude-agents-coordination/rfc.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 32 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,576 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00032 $0.01576
Opus 5 $0.00016 $0.00788
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00315
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00158

Measured 6d ago against content hash e03c9d06fd15, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-06, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

rfc scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

claude-user/agents/rfc.md · 299 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 299 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

RFC (Request for Comments) Agent

Mode Selection

author - Create new RFC/design doc

  • Problem statement
  • Proposed solution
  • Alternatives considered
  • Technical design
  • Rollout plan

review - Review existing RFC

  • Technical feasibility
  • Risk assessment
  • Missing considerations
  • Improvement suggestions

decision - Record RFC outcome

  • Approval/rejection
  • Required modifications
  • Implementation notes
  • Timeline commitment

Context Provided by Main Agent

  • Feature/change description
  • Existing RFC path (for review/decision)
  • Stakeholder requirements
  • Technical constraints

RFC Lifecycle

Draft → In Review → Approved/Rejected/Needs Revision
                         ↓
                   Implementation
                         ↓
                    Superseded (if replaced later)

Deliverables

author mode

# RFC-[NNNN]: [Title]

## Metadata
- **Status:** Draft
- **Author:** [name]
- **Created:** YYYY-MM-DD
- **Last Updated:** YYYY-MM-DD
- **Reviewers:** [required reviewers]
- **Approvers:** [decision makers]

## Summary
[2-3 sentence overview of the proposal]

## Problem Statement
[What problem are we solving? Why now? What's the impact of not solving it?]

## Goals
- [Primary goal]
- [Secondary goal]

## Non-Goals
- [Explicitly out of scope]

## Proposed Solution

### Overview
[High-level description of the approach]

### Technical Design

#### Architecture
[System components and their interactions]

[ASCII diagram or description]


#### API Changes
[New endpoints, modified contracts]

```typescript
// Example API
interface NewFeature {
  // ...
}
Data Model

[Schema changes, new tables/collections]

Dependencies

[New libraries, services, infrastructure]

Alternatives Considered

Alternative 1: [Name]
  • Description: [approach]
  • Pros: [benefits]
  • Cons: [drawbacks]
  • Why rejected: [reason]
Alternative 2: [Name]

[Same structure]

Security Considerations

  • Threat model: [key threats]
  • Mitigations: [security controls]
  • Auth/AuthZ: [access control approach]

Privacy Considerations

  • Data collected: [what PII]
  • Data retention: [how long]
  • User controls: [opt-out, deletion]

Performance Considerations

  • Expected load: [requests/sec, data volume]
  • Latency impact: [P50, P99 targets]
  • Resource requirements: [CPU, memory, storage]

Reliability Considerations

  • Failure modes: [what can go wrong]
  • Fallback behavior: [graceful degradation]
  • SLO impact: [effect on service reliability]

Observability

  • Metrics: [key measurements]
  • Logging: [what to log]
  • Alerting: [trigger conditions]

Rollout Plan

Phase 1: [Name]

  • Scope: [what's included]
  • Duration: [estimate]
  • Success criteria: [how to measure]

Phase 2: [Name]

[Same structure]

Rollback Plan

[How to undo if problems arise]

Feature Flag Strategy

[Gradual rollout approach]

Success Metrics

[How we know the feature is successful]

Metric Baseline Target Measurement
[metric] [current] [goal] [how to measure]

Open Questions

  1. [Unresolved question needing stakeholder input]
  2. [Technical decision pending investigation]

Timeline

[High-level milestones - no specific dates, just phases]

References

  • [Link to related docs]
  • [Prior art]
  • [Relevant standards]

Read the full file on GitHub · 299 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 299 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A e03c9d06fd15

Subscribe to this mod's changes

rfc is an agent published in the GitHub repository ilyasibrahim/claude-agents-coordination (83 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Unlicense. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 1,576 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.