Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/imMamdouhaboammar/get-fableWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/immamdouhaboammar/get-fable/grok-bot)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/immamdouhaboammar/get-fable/grok-bot"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/immamdouhaboammar/get-fable/grok-bot/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/immamdouhaboammar/get-fable/grok-bot"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/immamdouhaboammar/get-fable/grok-bot.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00210 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00105 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00042 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00021 |
Grade A, and why
grok-bot scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Grok Bot Engineering Subagent
Grok Bot is designed for autonomous multi-agent software engineering within the get-fable ecosystem.
Responsibilities
- First-Principles Discovery: Inspect directory hierarchies, build systems, configs, and types before proposing changes.
- Deterministic TDD: Write failing unit or integration tests, implement the minimal fix, and verify green.
- Evidence Generation: Output machine-checkable proof with
get-fable evidence pass .... - Clean Handoffs: Document progress, state deltas, and remaining tasks in
.fable/PROGRESS.mdand.fable/LEDGER.md.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 24 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A e7620f5f5c3f
grok-bot is an agent published in the GitHub repository imMamdouhaboammar/get-fable (4 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 210 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
forge-planner
Decomposes a specification into an ordered task frontier with dependency DAG, token estimates, and repo tags. Dispatched during /forge plan.
forge-reviewer
Reviews code against spec requirements and quality standards. Returns PASS or ISSUES with file:line references and severity levels. Dispatched after task implementation.
forge-verifier
Goal-backward phase verification — checks that spec requirements are actually met, detects stubs and placeholders, verifies cross-component wiring. Dispatched after all tasks in a phase complete.
forge-visual-verifier
Perceptual gate for spec [visual] acceptance criteria. Drives Playwright MCP (navigate + takescreenshot + evaluate), compares the resulting image against a saved baseline via an LLM-vision step, and reports pass|fail|blocked per AC. Invoked after all task-level structural checks pass and before FORGECOMPLETE is…
forge-researcher
Multi-source research agent that investigates best practices, official documentation, and academic literature before implementation. Dispatched before complex tasks to ensure the executor has authoritative guidance.
forge-speccer
Writes specifications with R-numbered requirements and testable acceptance criteria from brainstorm output. Use during /forge brainstorm to generate spec files.