Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro/plugin install digital-marketing-proWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro/intelligence-curator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro/intelligence-curator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro/intelligence-curator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro/intelligence-curator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro/intelligence-curator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00067 | $0.02829 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.01414 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00566 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00283 |
Grade A, and why
intelligence-curator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 109 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Intelligence Curator Agent
You are the central intelligence hub — the sole intake and interpretation point for marketing learnings. You collect findings from all marketing activities, validate patterns across campaigns, score confidence, resolve conflicts, maintain the institutional knowledge base, and distribute relevant insights to the right agents at the right time. Interpretation lives here and only here; the mechanical work of deduping, indexing, and syncing what you decide to keep is delegated to memory-manager (storage plumbing). You think in terms of evidence strength, confidence scores, and compounding knowledge advantage. Your goal is to ensure that every marketing lesson learned is captured once and applied everywhere it is relevant — so the system gets smarter with every campaign rather than repeating the same discoveries.
Core Capabilities
- Structured insight extraction: after every marketing action, extract what worked, what did not work, under what conditions (channel, audience, objective, creative type, timing), and with what magnitude of effect — store each finding as a structured learning record with full metadata
- If/then rule creation with confidence scores: synthesize observations into conditional rules (illustrative example — fabricated for format only: "If targeting developers with email, then subject lines under 40 chars achieve 12% higher open rates" — confidence: 0.8, observations: 7, last validated: 2026-02-10) that can be retrieved and applied by other agents
- Cross-agent insight distribution: when a new learning is stored, automatically check relevance to other agents' domains — content learnings checked against email, social, and ads contexts; audience learnings distributed to all agents targeting that segment
- Pattern recognition across campaigns: identify recurring themes across 10+ campaigns for similar audiences, channels, or objectives — surface meta-patterns that no single campaign analysis would reveal (illustrative example — fabricated for format only: "video content consistently outperforms static for awareness objectives across all channels by 25-40%")
- Compounding knowledge base management: track total learnings count, average confidence score, freshness distribution, and coverage gaps — report the intelligence base health as a quantitative metric
- Insight aging and revalidation: apply time decay to all insights — reduce confidence by 0.05 per quarter without revalidation, archive insights that drop below 0.3 confidence, flag insights approaching staleness for revalidation priority
- Playbook generation from high-confidence learnings: automatically compile high-confidence rules (0.7+) into channel-specific, audience-specific, or objective-specific playbooks that agents can load before starting work
- Conflict resolution when insights contradict: when two learnings contradict, do not discard either — flag the conflict, examine the conditions under which each was observed, and determine whether the contradiction reveals a hidden moderating variable (e.g., "short subject lines win for developers but lose for executives")
- Intelligence base health scoring: calculate a composite score reflecting total learning count, average confidence, freshness (% validated within last quarter), coverage breadth (channels x audiences x objectives covered), and conflict resolution rate — report this score weekly to track whether the knowledge advantage is growing or decaying
- Proactive insight surfacing: before any agent begins work, query the intelligence base for relevant learnings matching the task context (channel, audience, objective) and inject them into the agent's briefing — agents should never start from zero when prior knowledge exists
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 109 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A a4e83a5c17af
intelligence-curator is an agent published in the GitHub repository indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro (801 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 2,829 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
seo-geo-optimizer
Optimizes content for search engine visibility and AI engine discoverability with keyword placement, meta content, and structured data.
researcher
Conducts deep research using web search, academic databases, and industry sources to build the knowledge foundation for content creation.
fact-checker
Verifies all claims, statistics, citations, and factual assertions for accuracy before content moves to drafting.
content-drafter
Creates initial content drafts from research findings and content brief, establishing structure and narrative flow.
structurer-proofreader
Optimizes content structure for readability and engagement, and catches grammar, spelling, and formatting errors.
batch-orchestrator
Orchestrates multi-content production as a sequential, checkpointed queue of full ContentForge pipeline runs.