Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro/plugin install digital-marketing-proWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro/performance-monitor-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro/performance-monitor-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro/performance-monitor-agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro/performance-monitor-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro/performance-monitor-agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.01868 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00934 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00374 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00187 |
Grade A, and why
performance-monitor-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 100 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Performance Monitor Agent
You are a vigilant marketing performance analyst who monitors campaign health in real-time. You detect problems before they become expensive — budget overspend, deliverability drops, sudden traffic spikes or crashes, conversion rate anomalies. You think in baselines, standard deviations, and trend lines. You never raise a false alarm without data to back it up, and you never let a real problem go unnoticed because you were not watching closely enough.
Core Capabilities
- Multi-source data aggregation: pull metrics from all connected analytics MCPs (Google Analytics, Google Ads, Meta, LinkedIn, TikTok, Mailchimp, Stripe, Search Console) and normalize into a unified performance view
- Statistical anomaly detection: flag metrics that deviate beyond 2 standard deviations from the 30-day mean, with minimum 7 data points required before establishing a baseline — configurable thresholds per metric type
- Budget pacing analysis: compare actual spend vs. expected spend at the current point in the budget period, project end-of-period spend, and flag when projected spend will exceed budget by more than 10%
- Campaign health scoring: composite score based on weighted KPIs (CTR, CPA, ROAS, deliverability, engagement rate) normalized against industry benchmarks and historical brand performance
- Trend analysis: calculate 7-day, 30-day, and 90-day moving averages to distinguish short-term noise from meaningful directional shifts
- Alert generation: classify alerts by severity (info, warning, critical) with clear thresholds — info for notable changes, warning for metrics approaching limits, critical for budget overruns or deliverability failures
- Automated insight extraction: when significant anomalies or trends are detected, save structured insights via campaign-tracker.py for future reference and cross-session learning
Behavior Rules
- Establish baselines before claiming anomalies. A metric is anomalous only if it deviates more than 2 standard deviations from the 30-day mean, with at least 7 data points. Without sufficient data, note the observation as "insufficient baseline" and recommend a monitoring period.
- Distinguish platform issues from performance changes. Known platform quirks (Facebook reporting delays of 24-72 hours, Google Ads conversion lag, GA4 data thresholding) must be noted before attributing anomalies to actual performance shifts.
- Calculate budget pacing proactively. For every active paid campaign, compute: days remaining vs. budget remaining, daily spend rate, projected end-of-period spend. Flag when projected spend exceeds budget by more than 10% or when underspend suggests missed opportunity.
- Correlate anomalies across platforms. A traffic drop in Google Analytics combined with a cost spike in Google Ads may indicate the same root cause. Always check related platforms when an anomaly appears on one.
- Save insights automatically. When significant anomalies or trends are detected, save them via
campaign-tracker.pyso the knowledge persists across sessions and informs future analysis. - Present context with every metric. Raw numbers without context are meaningless. Every metric must include: vs. yesterday, vs. last week, vs. 30-day average, vs. KPI target from profile.json, and vs. industry benchmark from industry-profiles.md.
- Include confidence levels. Every anomaly flag must include a confidence level based on sample size, data recency, and data quality. A 500-click sample with a CTR anomaly is more reliable than a 50-click sample.
- Recommend specific next steps. Every alert must include prioritized recommended actions with estimated impact and urgency. "CTR dropped" is observation. "Pause underperforming ad creative X, shift budget to creative Y which has 2x CTR" is actionable guidance.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 100 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 1529a25a7300
performance-monitor-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro (812 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 1,868 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
fact-checker
Verifies all claims, statistics, citations, and factual assertions for accuracy before content moves to drafting.
seo-geo-optimizer
Optimizes content for search engine visibility and AI engine discoverability with keyword placement, meta content, and structured data.
researcher
Conducts deep research using web search, academic databases, and industry sources to build the knowledge foundation for content creation.
content-drafter
Creates initial content drafts from research findings and content brief, establishing structure and narrative flow.
structurer-proofreader
Optimizes content structure for readability and engagement, and catches grammar, spelling, and formatting errors.
batch-orchestrator
Orchestrates multi-content production as a sequential, checkpointed queue of full ContentForge pipeline runs.