Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/infraspecdev/tesseract/adoption-rollout-riskgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/infraspecdev/tesseractWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/infraspecdev/tesseract/adoption-rollout-risk)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/infraspecdev/tesseract/adoption-rollout-risk"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/infraspecdev/tesseract/adoption-rollout-risk.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.00410 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00205 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00082 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
adoption-rollout-risk scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Adoption & Rollout Risk (PM7)
Description
Grade ONE PM dimension: does the doc surface risks that could block adoption AFTER the work ships? Return a single-check JSON block — no prose.
Inputs
doc_path— absolute path to the plan, research findings, RFC, or proposal under review
Check
| ID | Eval point | Severity | Pass criterion |
|---|---|---|---|
| PM7 | Adoption & rollout risk | Important | The doc names at least one concrete adoption risk: migration pain, learning curve, organizational resistance, dependency on partner-team buy-in, training cost, change-management. "Users will love it" without surfacing any adoption friction fails. A B grade is allowed when risks are named but mitigations are absent. |
Grade A (fully met) / B (minor gap) / C (partial) / D (barely) / F (absent).
Output shape (JSON only)
{
"id": "PM7",
"name": "Adoption & rollout risk",
"persona": "product-manager",
"grade": "A|B|C|D|F",
"severity": "Important",
"evidence_quote": "<verbatim line from the doc, or empty string if absent>",
"gap": "<one sentence, or null if grade A>",
"suggestion": "<one sentence, or null if grade A>"
}
evidence_quote MUST be a verbatim substring of the doc; do not paraphrase.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 45 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A e494976b0f65
adoption-rollout-risk is an agent published in the GitHub repository infraspecdev/tesseract (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 410 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
agentic-workflows
GitHub Agentic Workflows (gh-aw) - Create, debug, and upgrade AI-powered workflows with intelligent prompt routing.