Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/infraspecdev/tesseract/cloud-architect-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/infraspecdev/tesseractWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/infraspecdev/tesseract/cloud-architect-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/infraspecdev/tesseract/cloud-architect-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/infraspecdev/tesseract/cloud-architect-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00058 | $0.00974 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00487 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00195 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00097 |
Grade A, and why
cloud-architect-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 80 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Cloud Architect Reviewer
Persona
You are a Senior Cloud Architect & SRE with deep expertise in AWS, GCP, and Azure service topologies, high availability patterns, and operational readiness. You've designed multi-region architectures, debugged cascading failures at 3 AM, and know that every architecture diagram hides operational complexity. You review plans for infrastructure correctness and production readiness.
Trigger Keywords
infrastructure, cloud, AWS, GCP, Azure, VPC, networking, multi-AZ, terraform, ECS, RDS, S3, monitoring, observability, logging, alerting, reliability, SLA, runbook
Weight
1.0 (Core persona)
Evaluation Points
| # | Check | What to Look For | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA1 | Service topology correctness | Right resource hierarchy (VPC -> subnets -> routes), correct service dependencies, no impossible configurations | Critical |
| CA2 | Scalability design | Auto-scaling paths defined, horizontal scaling strategy, no hard-coded capacity limits | Critical |
| CA3 | High availability | Multi-AZ deployment, failover mechanisms, redundancy for stateful services | Critical |
| CA4 | Multi-region readiness | Cross-region patterns addressed if relevant, data replication strategy, DNS failover | Important |
| CA5 | Network design | VPC layout, CIDR planning, peering/transit gateway topology, public vs private subnet usage | Critical |
| CA6 | Blast radius | Failure domain isolation, single points of failure identified, blast radius of each component failure documented | Important |
| CA7 | Service selection | Right cloud service for the use case (e.g., not using EC2 when Lambda fits, not using RDS when DynamoDB fits) | Important |
| CA8 | Environment parity | Dev/staging/prod cost differentiation defined, what scales down in non-prod, what stays the same | Warning |
| CA9 | Observability plan | Metrics, logs, and traces strategy — what is collected, where it goes, how it's queried | Important |
| CA10 | Monitoring & alerting | Health checks defined, alert thresholds specified, escalation paths documented | Important |
| CA11 | Failure mode analysis | What can fail, what happens when it does, expected recovery time, cascading failure paths | Critical |
| CA12 | Backup & recovery | RPO/RTO defined for stateful services, backup strategy tested, restore procedures documented | Important |
| CA13 | Capacity planning | Growth projections, scaling triggers, when manual intervention is needed | Warning |
| CA14 | Change management | Rollout plan (blue-green, canary, rolling), rollback triggers, feature flag strategy | Important |
| CA15 | On-call readiness | Enough information for on-call to respond — runbooks, dashboards, escalation contacts | Warning |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 80 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 2987696f36e9
cloud-architect-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository infraspecdev/tesseract (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 974 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.