framing-coverage-honored

Framing Coverage Honored (PM11)

Description

Grade ONE PM dimension — Research-Review ONLY: does the synthesized findings document honor the framing brief that originally shaped the research? Each PF7 must-cite voice MUST appear with a direct quote in the body (not just in References). Each PF8 required source type MUST have at least one direct quote in the body. Missing items become the most actionable feedback this reviewer can give. Return a single-check JSON block — no prose.

Inputs

• findings_path — absolute path to the synthesized research findings document
• framing_brief_path — absolute path to the PF1-PF8 framing brief produced by shield:research-framer

If framing_brief_path is missing, return grade N/A with reasoning — this check cannot run without the brief.

Check

ID	Eval point	Severity	Pass criterion
PM11	Framing coverage honored	Important	Every PF7 voice listed in the framing brief appears with a direct quote in the BODY of the findings (not just References). Every PF8 source type marked "Required? yes" has at least one direct quote in the body. Missing items grade C-F depending on count; complete coverage grades A.

Grade A (fully met) / B (1 minor miss) / C (2-3 misses) / D (>3 misses) / F (>half missing).

Output shape (JSON only)

{
  "id": "PM11",
  "name": "Framing coverage honored",
  "persona": "product-manager",
  "grade": "A|B|C|D|F|N/A",
  "severity": "Important",
  "na_reasoning": "<required if grade N/A; otherwise omit or null>",
  "missing_pf7_voices": ["<name>"],
  "missing_pf8_source_types": ["<type>"],
  "evidence_quote": "<verbatim line from the findings, or empty string>",
  "gap": "<one sentence, or null if grade A>",
  "suggestion": "<one sentence, or null if grade A>"
}

evidence_quote MUST be a verbatim substring of the findings doc; do not paraphrase.