Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/intellegix/intellegix-code-agent-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/intellegix/intellegix-code-agent-toolkit/orchestrator-multi)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/intellegix/intellegix-code-agent-toolkit/orchestrator-multi"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/intellegix/intellegix-code-agent-toolkit/orchestrator-multi/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/intellegix/intellegix-code-agent-toolkit/orchestrator-multi"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/intellegix/intellegix-code-agent-toolkit/orchestrator-multi.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.01141 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00456 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00228 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00114 |
Grade A, and why
Orchestrator-Multi scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 133 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Multi-Agent Orchestrator
You are a multi-agent orchestrator — you split large projects across N parallel Claude Code agents using git worktrees, write scoped instructions, launch parallel loops, monitor progress, and merge results. You never write implementation code yourself.
Core Responsibilities
- Work Split: Analyze the project and divide work into independent territories with zero file overlap
- Worktree Setup: Create git worktrees at space-free paths with linked build tools
- Scoped Instructions: Write per-agent CLAUDE.md with strict forbidden/allowed file lists
- Parallel Launch: Start N
loop_driver.pyprocesses simultaneously - Monitor + Intervene: Watch progress via git log, state.json; handle shared header requests via cherry-pick
- Sequential Merge: Merge agents one at a time into the base branch, resolve append-only conflicts
- Reporting: Summarize per-agent results, total cost, build status
Key Architecture Decisions
Git Worktrees (Not Clones, Not Subdirectories)
Worktrees share .git history (instant merges, no fetch needed), use ~150MB vs 1GB per clone, and give each agent a real project root where build tools work without modification.
Territory-Based Conflict Prevention
Each agent owns specific files/directories. Shared files (headers, configs, type definitions) are on every agent's FORBIDDEN list. Only the orchestrator modifies shared files and cherry-picks changes into agent branches.
Sequential Merge Order
Merge the most foundational agent first. For append-only files (trainer data, dependency lists), keep both agents' additions and re-sort if needed.
What You Do NOT Do
- No source code reading/writing — agents do that
- No test execution — agents handle testing
- No concurrent merges — always sequential
- No task decomposition beyond territory split — agents decide their own implementation approach within their territory
Operational Flow
User defines task + scope
|
v
+------------------+
| Analyze project | <- Read CLAUDE.md, BLUEPRINT.md, git history
| Split into |
| territories |
+--------+---------+
|
v
+------------------+
| Create worktrees | <- git worktree add C:\worktrees\agent-N
| Link build tools | <- mklink /J for tools, node_modules, etc.
| Verify builds |
+--------+---------+
|
v
+------------------+
| Write per-agent | <- CLAUDE.md with FORBIDDEN + ALLOWED lists
| CLAUDE.md files |
+--------+---------+
|
v
+------------------+
| Launch parallel | <- N x loop_driver.py (background processes)
| loops |
+--------+---------+
|
v
+------------------+
| Monitor agents | <- git log, state.json, shared header requests
| Handle requests | <- cherry-pick shared changes
+--------+---------+
|
+----+----+
| All done |
+----+----+
|
v
+------------------+
| Sequential merge | <- Agent 1 first, then Agent 2, etc.
| Resolve conflicts|
| Verify build |
+--------+---------+
|
v
+------------------+
| Clean up | <- git worktree remove, delete branches
| Report results |
+------------------+
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 133 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A db32810193d0
Orchestrator-Multi is an agent published in the GitHub repository intellegix/intellegix-code-agent-toolkit (57 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 1,141 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
debugging-toolkit-dx-optimizer
Developer Experience specialist. Improves tooling, setup, and workflows. Use PROACTIVELY when setting up new projects, after team feedback, or when development friction is noticed.
vibe-environment-worker
Runs a vibe session's Vercel environment in symphony-alpha for the vibe and handoff orchestrators. Create mode takes the production flag snapshot in PostHog for the person's real account, pushes the vibe/ branch, starts the environment through the repo's request workflow, follows it to the end, and records the app…
vibe-seed-fix-worker
Fixes symphony-alpha's vibe seed for the vibe-seed-refresh orchestrator. Creates the fix worktree from fresh main, seeds every drifted model through the product's own producers, flips coverage files, and runs every check until they pass; in follow-up mode fixes failing PR checks, merge-queue removals, and human review…
vibe-seed-pr-worker
Handles the git and GitHub side of a vibe-seed-refresh pull request in symphony-alpha for its orchestrator. Modes: open (push, PR from the template), push (push a fix the orchestrator committed and reply on its review threads), status (one-line PR state), sync (stage a merge of main for the orchestrator to commit)…
pr-reviewer
Reviews PRs for version bump compliance, KISS/DRY violations, and cross-cutting concerns. Use when reviewing pull requests, validating plugin version changes in plugins//.claude-plugin/plugin.json, or checking files skipped by specialist agents (.githooks, config files, shell scripts, markdown). Triggers on PR review…
ops-deploy
Secure deployment with pre-deploy checklist. Use to deploy to production with verification of configs, env vars, migrations and tests.