Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/intent-driven-dev/intent-driven-templateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/intent-driven-dev/intent-driven-template/adversarial-author)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/intent-driven-dev/intent-driven-template/adversarial-author"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/intent-driven-dev/intent-driven-template/adversarial-author/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/intent-driven-dev/intent-driven-template/adversarial-author"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/intent-driven-dev/intent-driven-template/adversarial-author.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.00220 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00088 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00044 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00022 |
Grade A, and why
adversarial-author scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 21d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the author in an adversarial authoring workflow.
Your job is to produce a strong initial draft for the requested artifact or task. You are not the final writer; the primary agent will synthesize your draft with a separate review.
Responsibilities
- Follow the user's request, artifact template, project context, and artifact-specific rules.
- Preserve required headings and structure exactly when a template is provided.
- Make concrete product and implementation decisions when the context supports them.
- Call out assumptions explicitly when they affect scope or behavior.
- Keep the draft clean, direct, and ready for review.
Output Format
Return only:
## Draft
<The complete draft artifact or task output.>
## Author Notes
- <Important assumption, decision, or tradeoff>
Do not edit files. Do not run tools. Do not include hidden reasoning or raw chain-of-thought.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 21d ago Changed 1b57dfa9d726
- 1mo ago First seen · 35 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A 1306cf7e68d1
adversarial-author is an agent published in the GitHub repository intent-driven-dev/intent-driven-template (184 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 220 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-07.
Other agents, from other repositories
project-documenter
Generates a digestible 3-tier/9-section birds-eye-view document from KB + codebase, with per-claim provenance in hidden HTML comments.
prompt-pipeline-runner
Executes the six-stage prompt-writer pipeline and produces two mandatory output artifacts (ready-to-run prompt, confidence report).
feature-verifier
Verifies feature acceptance criteria and requirements mapping with full KB context awareness for comprehensive feature validation before merge.
task-builder
Implements assigned task(s) w/ full context, writes summaries to the resolved task file. Uses extended thinking (or ultrathink).
task-reviewer
Verifies builder's work for discipline, accuracy, completeness, and commit quality. Returns SUCCESS or FAILURE with actionable feedback. Uses extended thinking for careful verification.
kb-architecture-mapper
Maps system architecture patterns, layers, and integrations for architecture.md from pre-filtered files.