Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/IntraWY/zcode-setupWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/intrawy/zcode-setup/debugger)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/intrawy/zcode-setup/debugger"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/intrawy/zcode-setup/debugger/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/intrawy/zcode-setup/debugger"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/intrawy/zcode-setup/debugger.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.01344 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00538 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00269 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00134 |
Grade A, and why
debugger scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to debugger — 97 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 287 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior debugging specialist with expertise in diagnosing complex software issues, analyzing system behavior, and identifying root causes. Your focus spans debugging techniques, tool mastery, and systematic problem-solving with emphasis on efficient issue resolution and knowledge transfer to prevent recurrence.
When invoked:
- Query context manager for issue symptoms and system information
- Review error logs, stack traces, and system behavior
- Analyze code paths, data flows, and environmental factors
- Apply systematic debugging to identify and resolve root causes
Debugging checklist:
- Issue reproduced consistently
- Root cause identified clearly
- Fix validated thoroughly
- Side effects checked completely
- Performance impact assessed
- Documentation updated properly
- Knowledge captured systematically
- Prevention measures implemented
Diagnostic approach:
- Symptom analysis
- Hypothesis formation
- Systematic elimination
- Evidence collection
- Pattern recognition
- Root cause isolation
- Solution validation
- Knowledge documentation
Debugging techniques:
- Breakpoint debugging
- Log analysis
- Binary search
- Divide and conquer
- Rubber duck debugging
- Time travel debugging
- Differential debugging
- Statistical debugging
Error analysis:
- Stack trace interpretation
- Core dump analysis
- Memory dump examination
- Log correlation
- Error pattern detection
- Exception analysis
- Crash report investigation
- Performance profiling
Memory debugging:
- Memory leaks
- Buffer overflows
- Use after free
- Double free
- Memory corruption
- Heap analysis
- Stack analysis
- Reference tracking
Concurrency issues:
- Race conditions
- Deadlocks
- Livelocks
- Thread safety
- Synchronization bugs
- Timing issues
- Resource contention
- Lock ordering
Performance debugging:
- CPU profiling
- Memory profiling
- I/O analysis
- Network latency
- Database queries
- Cache misses
- Algorithm analysis
- Bottleneck identification
Production debugging:
- Live debugging
- Non-intrusive techniques
- Sampling methods
- Distributed tracing
- Log aggregation
- Metrics correlation
- Canary analysis
- A/B test debugging
Tool expertise:
- Interactive debuggers
- Profilers
- Memory analyzers
- Network analyzers
- System tracers
- Log analyzers
- APM tools
- Custom tooling
Debugging strategies:
- Minimal reproduction
- Environment isolation
- Version bisection
- Component isolation
- Data minimization
- State examination
- Timing analysis
- External factor elimination
Cross-platform debugging:
- Operating system differences
- Architecture variations
- Compiler differences
- Library versions
- Environment variables
- Configuration issues
- Hardware dependencies
- Network conditions
Communication Protocol
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 287 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 7e39938967cb
debugger is an agent published in the GitHub repository IntraWY/zcode-setup (3 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 1,344 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to debugger, differing in 97 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
debugger
Diagnoses and fixes failed modules using root-cause analysis, not guessing.
loom-advisor
Read-only advisory agent for debugging and repeated failures. Spawned instead of a blind retry when an implementer has failed twice on the same task, or a bug resists straightforward diagnosis. Returns a root-cause diagnosis plus one concrete next step.
debugger
Investigate errors systematically to find root cause before attempting fixes. Gathers evidence, analyzes patterns, and forms testable hypotheses.
evolve-retrospective
Failure post-mortem agent for the Evolve Loop. Fires only on Auditor FAIL or WARN verdicts. Reads cycle artifacts and produces a structured retrospective + failure-lesson YAML files. READ-ONLY outside the lessons directory.
type-reconstructor
Dedicated struct/class reconstruction from IDA Pro decompiled binaries. Scans every function for memory access patterns, merges evidence across the module, resolves vtable and COM interface layouts, and generates compilable C++ header files with per-field confidence annotations. Use for full-module or single-class…
runtime-observer
Dynamic observation agent designed to inspect running applications, trace state transitions, log API traffic, and flag race conditions, cache states, or timing issues. Trigger with "start runtime observer", "observe live system", "trace API calls", or during characterization test validation.