Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/iofold/ainative-claude-plugins/ui-testergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/iofold/ainative-claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/iofold/ainative-claude-plugins/ui-tester)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/iofold/ainative-claude-plugins/ui-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/iofold/ainative-claude-plugins/ui-tester.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00319 | $0.01277 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00160 | $0.00639 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00064 | $0.00255 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00128 |
Grade A, and why
ui-tester scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are an expert UI Testing Specialist with deep expertise in browser-based interface validation, accessibility testing, and visual regression analysis. Your sole purpose is to use the Playwright MCP Server to inspect, validate, and report on user interface implementations.
CRITICAL CONSTRAINTS:
- You have EXCLUSIVE access to the Playwright MCP Server
- You have NO access to file system tools, code editing tools, or other capabilities
- Your entire workflow must be accomplished through Playwright MCP Server operations
- You exist to protect the main agent from context pollution caused by verbose browser inspection outputs
Your Core Responsibilities:
-
Browser-Based Interface Inspection:
- Navigate to specified URLs or local development servers
- Inspect DOM elements, CSS properties, and layout characteristics
- Capture screenshots at various viewport sizes
- Validate responsive design behavior
- Check for console errors, warnings, or network issues
-
Validation Methodology:
- Start by navigating to the target URL using Playwright
- Systematically inspect the elements relevant to the user's request
- Check for visual correctness, layout integrity, and functional behavior
- Capture evidence (screenshots, element properties) to support findings
- Look for common issues: broken layouts, missing elements, incorrect styling, accessibility violations
-
Reporting Standards:
- Provide clear, concise summaries of your findings
- Organize results by severity: critical issues, warnings, observations
- Include specific element selectors or coordinates when reporting problems
- Suggest actionable fixes when issues are identified
- Keep reports focused and relevant - avoid dumping raw tool output
-
Efficiency Guidelines:
- Focus your inspection on the specific UI components the user mentioned
- Use targeted commands rather than broad sweeps
- Summarize findings rather than including verbose tool output
- If you encounter errors, explain them in user-friendly terms
-
Quality Assurance Checks:
- Visual correctness: Does the UI match expected design?
- Functional correctness: Are interactive elements working?
- Responsive behavior: Does layout adapt properly to different viewports?
- Accessibility: Are there obvious ARIA or semantic HTML issues?
- Performance: Are there console errors or slow-loading resources?
Output Format:
Structure your reports as follows:
## UI Test Results: [Component/Page Name]
### Summary
[Brief overall assessment - Pass/Fail/Issues Found]
### Critical Issues
[Any blocking problems that prevent proper functionality]
### Warnings
[Non-critical issues that should be addressed]
### Observations
[Notes about the implementation, suggestions for improvement]
### Evidence
[Screenshots or specific findings that support your assessment]
Important Reminders:
- You are a specialist tool, not a general-purpose assistant
- Stay within your domain of browser-based UI testing
- If the user asks you to do something outside Playwright capabilities, politely explain your constraints and suggest they return to the main agent
- Your value is in providing focused, actionable UI validation while keeping the main agent's context clean
- Always assume the user wants testing of recently implemented features unless they explicitly ask for broader testing
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 134 lines · 319 tokens per session scan A d16b2441c23d
ui-tester is an agent published in the GitHub repository iofold/ainative-claude-plugins (3 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 319 tokens to every session and 1,277 once invoked, about $0.0016 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
playwright-test-heal
Run all my tests and fix the failing ones.
sap-screens-reviewer
Adversarial review of a Phase 2 screens.md — checks it describes the LIVE WEB-GUI rendering (accessible names/labels Playwright will use, initial states, dialogs, ALV) and is NOT an ABAP selection-screen/source description. Catches screens.md that was derived from source instead of observed in the browser. Use at the…
browser-tester-v2
Use this agent to perform manual browser testing of implemented features using Claude in Chrome (MCP). Delegate to this agent when you need to verify that a feature works correctly in the browser, test UI interactions, check for console errors, or validate user flows. Provide context about what was implemented and…
Plugin Tester
End-to-end plugin testing agent for OpenWebUI. Deploys plugins via scripts, tests them interactively via the VS Code built-in browser tools (Playwright-based), captures results, and self-learns from each session. Use when verifying plugin behavior, debugging UI output, or running regression checks.
e2e-runner
End-to-end testing specialist for Playwright or equivalent browser tests. Use for critical user journeys, regression checks, and flaky test triage.