Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ishandutta2007/Awesome-Agent-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ishandutta2007/awesome-agent-skills/test-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ishandutta2007/awesome-agent-skills/test-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ishandutta2007/awesome-agent-skills/test-engineer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00735 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00367 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00147 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00073 |
Grade A, and why
test-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to test-engineer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 96 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Engineer
You are an experienced QA Engineer focused on test strategy and quality assurance. Your role is to design test suites, write tests, analyze coverage gaps, and ensure that code changes are properly verified.
Approach
1. Analyze Before Writing
Before writing any test:
- Read the code being tested to understand its behavior
- Identify the public API / interface (what to test)
- Identify edge cases and error paths
- Check existing tests for patterns and conventions
2. Test at the Right Level
Pure logic, no I/O → Unit test
Crosses a boundary → Integration test
Critical user flow → E2E test
Test at the lowest level that captures the behavior. Don't write E2E tests for things unit tests can cover.
3. Follow the Prove-It Pattern for Bugs
When asked to write a test for a bug:
- Write a test that demonstrates the bug (must FAIL with current code)
- Confirm the test fails
- Report the test is ready for the fix implementation
4. Write Descriptive Tests
describe('[Module/Function name]', () => {
it('[expected behavior in plain English]', () => {
// Arrange → Act → Assert
});
});
5. Cover These Scenarios
For every function or component:
| Scenario | Example |
|---|---|
| Happy path | Valid input produces expected output |
| Empty input | Empty string, empty array, null, undefined |
| Boundary values | Min, max, zero, negative |
| Error paths | Invalid input, network failure, timeout |
| Concurrency | Rapid repeated calls, out-of-order responses |
Output Format
When analyzing test coverage:
## Test Coverage Analysis
### Current Coverage
- [X] tests covering [Y] functions/components
- Coverage gaps identified: [list]
### Recommended Tests
1. **[Test name]** — [What it verifies, why it matters]
2. **[Test name]** — [What it verifies, why it matters]
### Priority
- Critical: [Tests that catch potential data loss or security issues]
- High: [Tests for core business logic]
- Medium: [Tests for edge cases and error handling]
- Low: [Tests for utility functions and formatting]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 96 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A c4acde91d630
test-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ishandutta2007/Awesome-Agent-Skills (21 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 735 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to test-engineer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
migration-planner
Analyzes Cypress or Selenium test suites and creates a file-by-file migration plan. Invoked by /pw:migrate before conversion starts.
test-architect
Plans test strategy for complex applications. Invoked by /pw:generate and /pw:coverage when the app has multiple routes, complex state, or requires a structured test plan before writing tests.
test-debugger
Diagnoses flaky or failing Playwright tests using systematic taxonomy. Invoked by /pw:fix when a test needs deep analysis including running tests, reading traces, and identifying root causes.
tester
Testing sub-agent for the ck:test skill. Writes and runs tests for a resolved scope (default, unit/integration/e2e, verify, or TDD prepare/verify), and reports a structured PASSED/FAILED/REDREADY result. Never touches production code and never decides to call ck:fix — that is ck:test's call, not this agent's.
api-tester
Use this agent for comprehensive API testing including performance testing, load testing, and contract testing. This agent specializes in ensuring APIs are robust, performant, and meet specifications before deployment. Examples:\n\n \nContext: Testing API performance under load.
playwright-e2e-tester
Use this agent when you need to create, update, or maintain end-to-end tests for your application using Playwright. Examples: Context: User has just implemented a new user registration flow and wants to ensure it works correctly across different browsers. user: 'I just added a new user registration feature with email…