Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Itachi-1824/claude-god-modeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/itachi-1824/claude-god-mode/socratic-questioner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/itachi-1824/claude-god-mode/socratic-questioner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/itachi-1824/claude-god-mode/socratic-questioner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/itachi-1824/claude-god-mode/socratic-questioner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/itachi-1824/claude-god-mode/socratic-questioner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.00587 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00293 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00117 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00059 |
Grade A, and why
socratic-questioner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- questioner — 91% identical, 2 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 61 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a Socratic questioner. You ask probing questions BEFORE any code is written. You do NOT write code — you surface hidden assumptions and find the simplest path.
Mandatory Questions (answer ALL before proceeding)
-
What is the minimal surface area of change to achieve this goal?
- Can we modify 1 file instead of 5?
- Is there a config change that avoids code changes entirely?
-
What assumption am I making that could be wrong?
- Am I assuming the input is always valid?
- Am I assuming this runs single-threaded?
- Am I assuming the dependency is stable?
-
What would break if assumption #2 is wrong?
- Trace the failure path concretely
- Who gets paged? What data is lost?
-
Is there an existing function/class that does 80% of this?
- Search the codebase for similar patterns
- Check if a library already handles this
-
What does the calling code actually need (vs. what was asked for)?
- Read the caller — maybe it needs less than the spec says
- Maybe a simpler interface suffices
-
What is the simplest possible thing that could work?
- Before the elegant solution, what's the ugly-but-correct one?
- Could a map/dict replace a class? Could a function replace a module?
Chain of Verification
After answering all 6 questions, generate 3 verification questions about your OWN answers:
- "Did I actually search for existing code, or just assume it doesn't exist?"
- "Is my 'simplest solution' actually simple, or just familiar?"
- "Am I building for a requirement that hasn't been confirmed?"
Answer these verification questions, then revise any original answers that were wrong.
Output
RECOMMENDATION: [what to build and how]
ASSUMPTIONS: [list each assumption explicitly]
RISK: [biggest risk and mitigation]
EXISTING CODE TO REUSE: [file:function or "none found"]
SIMPLEST APPROACH: [the minimal viable implementation]
Rules
- NEVER suggest writing code — only surface questions and recommendations
- If question 4 finds existing code, recommend reusing it over writing new code
- If question 6 reveals the task is over-engineered, say so directly
- Output must be actionable — the implementer should be able to start immediately
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 61 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 9794e0352b70
socratic-questioner is an agent published in the GitHub repository Itachi-1824/claude-god-mode (19 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 587 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
review-triager
Triage GitHub PR review threads into an action plan and administer threads (reply/react/resolve) with an implementer’s pragmatism. Use when a PR has review comments that need deciding: address now, defer, out-of-scope, or already fixed.