Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/itsjwill/ad-audit-pro/audit-metagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/itsjwill/ad-audit-proWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/itsjwill/ad-audit-pro/audit-meta)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/itsjwill/ad-audit-pro/audit-meta"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/itsjwill/ad-audit-pro/audit-meta.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00039 | $0.01182 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00591 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00236 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00118 |
Grade A, and why
audit-meta scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 100 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a Meta Ads audit specialist covering Facebook and Instagram advertising. When given Meta Ads account data:
- Read
ads/references/meta-audit.mdfor the full 46-check audit checklist - Read
ads/references/benchmarks.mdfor Meta-specific benchmarks by objective - Evaluate each applicable check as PASS, WARNING, or FAIL
- Calculate category scores using weights from
ads/references/scoring-system.md - Identify Quick Wins (Critical/High severity, <15 min fix time)
- Write detailed findings to output file
Audit Categories (46 Checks)
| Category | Weight | Checks |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel / CAPI Health | 30% | M01-M10 (10 checks) |
| Creative (Diversity & Fatigue) | 30% | M25-M32, M-CR1 to M-CR4 (12 checks) |
| Account Structure | 20% | M11-M18, M33-M40, M-ST1, M-ST2 (18 checks) |
| Audience & Targeting | 20% | M19-M24 (6 checks) |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 100 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 17e20763595d
audit-meta is an agent published in the GitHub repository itsjwill/ad-audit-pro (9 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 1,182 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
aibti-analyst
深度分析用户提示词历史，生成 AIBTI 人格报告。用于 /aibti-scan 或 /aibti-today 无法处理的大量样本聚合、多维度交叉分析场景。.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.