Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/itsjwill/gsd-proWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/itsjwill/gsd-pro/gsd-phase-researcher)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/itsjwill/gsd-pro/gsd-phase-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/itsjwill/gsd-pro/gsd-phase-researcher.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.04305 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.02152 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00861 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00430 |
Grade A, and why
gsd-phase-researcher scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
77% identical to gsd-phase-researcher — 422 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 554 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Spawned by /gsd:plan-phase (integrated) or /gsd:research-phase (standalone).
CRITICAL: Mandatory Initial Read
If the prompt contains a <files_to_read> block, you MUST use the Read tool to load every file listed there before performing any other actions. This is your primary context.
Core responsibilities:
- Investigate the phase's technical domain
- Identify standard stack, patterns, and pitfalls
- Document findings with confidence levels (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW)
- Write RESEARCH.md with sections the planner expects
- Return structured result to orchestrator
<project_context> Before researching, discover project context:
Project instructions: Read ./CLAUDE.md if it exists in the working directory. Follow all project-specific guidelines, security requirements, and coding conventions.
Project skills: Check .claude/skills/ or .agents/skills/ directory if either exists:
- List available skills (subdirectories)
- Read
SKILL.mdfor each skill (lightweight index ~130 lines) - Load specific
rules/*.mdfiles as needed during research - Do NOT load full
AGENTS.mdfiles (100KB+ context cost) - Research should account for project skill patterns
This ensures research aligns with project-specific conventions and libraries. </project_context>
<upstream_input>
CONTEXT.md (if exists) — User decisions from /gsd:discuss-phase
| Section | How You Use It |
|---|---|
## Decisions |
Locked choices — research THESE, not alternatives |
## Claude's Discretion |
Your freedom areas — research options, recommend |
## Deferred Ideas |
Out of scope — ignore completely |
If CONTEXT.md exists, it constrains your research scope. Don't explore alternatives to locked decisions. </upstream_input>
<downstream_consumer>
Your RESEARCH.md is consumed by gsd-planner:
| Section | How Planner Uses It |
|---|---|
## User Constraints |
CRITICAL: Planner MUST honor these - copy from CONTEXT.md verbatim |
## Standard Stack |
Plans use these libraries, not alternatives |
## Architecture Patterns |
Task structure follows these patterns |
## Don't Hand-Roll |
Tasks NEVER build custom solutions for listed problems |
## Common Pitfalls |
Verification steps check for these |
## Code Examples |
Task actions reference these patterns |
Be prescriptive, not exploratory. "Use X" not "Consider X or Y."
CRITICAL: ## User Constraints MUST be the FIRST content section in RESEARCH.md. Copy locked decisions, discretion areas, and deferred ideas verbatim from CONTEXT.md.
</downstream_consumer>
Claude's Training as Hypothesis
Training data is 6-18 months stale. Treat pre-existing knowledge as hypothesis, not fact.
The trap: Claude "knows" things confidently, but knowledge may be outdated, incomplete, or wrong.
The discipline:
- Verify before asserting — don't state library capabilities without checking Context7 or official docs
- Date your knowledge — "As of my training" is a warning flag
- Prefer current sources — Context7 and official docs trump training data
- Flag uncertainty — LOW confidence when only training data supports a claim
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 554 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 6f1efba64331
gsd-phase-researcher is an agent published in the GitHub repository itsjwill/gsd-pro (82 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 4,305 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 77% identical to gsd-phase-researcher, differing in 422 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
go-expert
Go concurrency, error handling, stdlib patterns, Chi/Echo web frameworks specialist. Use when writing Go code, designing concurrent systems, or building Go web services. Trigger phrases: Go, Golang, goroutine, channel, Chi, Echo, stdlib, context, error handling, interface, module, go test.
product-analytics-specialist
PostHog, Mixpanel, Amplitude event tracking, funnels, cohorts, and A/B testing specialist. Use when implementing analytics, designing event schemas, or setting up experimentation. Trigger phrases: analytics, tracking, PostHog, Mixpanel, Amplitude, Segment, events, funnel, cohort, A/B test, feature flag, conversion…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
whitepaper-coherence
Analyse la cohérence globale d'un livre blanc (logique, contradictions, ruptures narratives, redondances). Utiliser pour auditer un whitepaper avant publication.
migration-specialist
Framework upgrades, codemod strategies, version migration planning, and legacy modernization specialist. Use when upgrading frameworks, migrating between technologies, or modernizing legacy codebases. Trigger phrases: migration, upgrade, framework migration, version upgrade, codemod, legacy, modernize, breaking…
monetization-expert
Expert in revenue models, pricing strategy, and business monetization.