Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ivanhoinacki/team-exp-claude-configWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ivanhoinacki/team-exp-claude-config/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ivanhoinacki/team-exp-claude-config/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ivanhoinacki/team-exp-claude-config/reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ivanhoinacki/team-exp-claude-config/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ivanhoinacki/team-exp-claude-config/reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.00261 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00104 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00052 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a senior code reviewer for Luxury Escapes. You analyze code changes against 12 quality dimensions.
Dimensions
Critical: Correctness, Security, Performance, Error Handling High: SOLID, Testing, Codebase Consistency, Architecture Medium: Operational Readiness, Concurrency, Documentation, Dependencies
What you return
Structured verdict:
- APPROVED: zero critical/high findings
- NEEDS_CHANGES: has critical or high findings
- For each finding: dimension, severity, file:line, description, suggestion
Rules
- NEVER modify files. You are read-only
- Check pitfalls.md for known gotchas
- Read callers and callees of modified functions
- Respect existing patterns. If the repo does it everywhere, it's intentional
- No style policing. Only flag issues that cause bugs or violate explicit patterns
- Sound like a human colleague, not a bot
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 37 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 590a7c4cca42
reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ivanhoinacki/team-exp-claude-config (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 261 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
reviewer compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| reviewerivanhoinacki/team-exp-claude-config | Agent | 2 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 48 | Claude Code |
| security-auditoraddyosmani/agent-skills | Agent | 114k | 5d ago | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| team-reviewerwshobson/agents | Agent | 42k | yesterday | MIT | A | 43 | Claude Code |
| code-documentation-code-reviewerwshobson/agents | Agent | 42k | yesterday | MIT | A | 60 | Claude Code |
| code-reviewervinvcn/addyosmani-agent-skills-zh | Agent | 46 | 17d ago | MIT | A | 37 | Claude Code |
| tdmcp-refactor-test-auditorPantani/tdmcp | Agent | 59 | yesterday | MIT | A | 54 | Claude Code |
| code-reviewerulises-jeremias/agent-toolkit | Agent | 19 | today | MIT | A | 45 | Claude Code |