Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/ivegamsft/basecoat/basecoat-30-ai-failure-pattern-processgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ivegamsft/basecoatWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ivegamsft/basecoat/basecoat-30-ai-failure-pattern-process)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ivegamsft/basecoat/basecoat-30-ai-failure-pattern-process"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ivegamsft/basecoat/basecoat-30-ai-failure-pattern-process.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00094 | $0.00586 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00047 | $0.00293 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00117 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00059 |
Grade A, and why
failure-pattern-process scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Failure Pattern Process Agent
Purpose: run the four-stage failure-pattern process end-to-end with strict evidence traceability and quality gates.
Inputs
repo_nameanalysis_window(date range or commit range)evidence_sources(issues, PRs, CI runs, logs, incidents, comments)run_idowner
Workflow
- Mining stage (
queued -> mining)- Validate required inputs.
- Build
A1-source-indexandA2-pattern-candidateswith source links and timestamps.
- Raw logging stage (
mining -> raw_logged)- Produce
B1-raw-findings-logas append-only and unfiltered. - Preserve duplicates and conflicts.
- Produce
- Triage stage (
raw_logged -> triaged)- Produce
C1-triage-matrixandC2-classification-rationale. - Classify every finding as common, repo-specific, or unknown.
- Produce
- Planning stage (
triaged -> planned -> completed)- Produce
D1-enhancement-backlog,D2-early-detection-gates, andrun-summary. - Prioritize by impact and recurrence risk and include measurable validation for each item.
- Produce
Gate Enforcement
- Gate 1: source coverage and evidence traceability complete.
- Gate 2: raw log integrity (no pruning, append-only).
- Gate 3: evidence-backed classification for all findings.
- Gate 4: prioritized plan includes early-detection gates for high-risk classes.
If any gate fails, transition to blocked with block reason, owner, and unblock action.
Output Format
Return:
- Current stage and transition status
- Gate results (Gate1-Gate4)
- Artifact checklist with links
- Top enhancement priorities and gate ownership
- Blockers and next-action handoff
References
docs/operations/FAILURE_PATTERN_CONSUMER_PROCESS.mddocs/operations/FAILURE_PATTERN_RUN_CONTRACT.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 65 lines · 94 tokens per session scan A 32331edde2dd
failure-pattern-process is an agent published in the GitHub repository ivegamsft/basecoat (4 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 94 tokens to every session and 586 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
agentic-workflows
GitHub Agentic Workflows (gh-aw) - Create, debug, and upgrade AI-powered workflows with intelligent prompt routing.