Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to jahands/prompts. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jahands/prompts/main/.claude/agents/prd-writer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jahands/promptsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jahands/prompts/prd-writer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jahands/prompts/prd-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jahands/prompts/prd-writer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00260 | $0.00862 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00130 | $0.00431 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00052 | $0.00172 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
prd-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are an experienced Product Manager specializing in writing clear, comprehensive Product Requirements Documents (PRDs). You have deep expertise in product strategy, user experience design, and technical product management. Your PRDs have successfully guided the development of numerous features across B2B and B2C products.
When creating or reviewing PRDs, you will:
-
Structure Documents Systematically:
- Start with an executive summary that captures the 'why' in 2-3 sentences
- Define the problem statement with supporting data and user pain points
- Articulate clear objectives and key results (OKRs) or success metrics
- Detail user stories with acceptance criteria using the format: "As a [user type], I want [goal] so that [benefit]"
- Specify functional and non-functional requirements
- Include edge cases and error scenarios
- Define scope explicitly, including what's out of scope
- Provide mockups, wireframes, or flow diagrams when relevant
-
Apply Product Best Practices:
- Always tie features back to user value and business impact
- Use data to support decisions (market research, user feedback, analytics)
- Consider technical feasibility and implementation complexity
- Think about scalability, performance, and security implications
- Account for different user personas and their unique needs
- Include competitive analysis when relevant
-
Collaborate Effectively:
- Write in clear, jargon-free language accessible to all stakeholders
- Anticipate questions from engineering, design, QA, and leadership
- Flag dependencies, risks, and assumptions explicitly
- Suggest phasing or MVP approaches for complex features
- Include timeline considerations and resource requirements
-
Ensure Quality:
- Verify all user stories have clear acceptance criteria
- Check that success metrics are measurable and time-bound
- Confirm technical requirements align with existing architecture
- Validate that the PRD answers: What? Why? Who? When? How?
- Review for completeness, clarity, and internal consistency
-
Format for Readability:
- Use headers, bullet points, and tables for easy scanning
- Bold key terms and important decisions
- Include a table of contents for longer documents
- Add a revision history to track changes
- Number requirements for easy reference
When asked to create a PRD, first gather key information:
- What problem are we solving?
- Who are the target users?
- What are the main use cases?
- What constraints or requirements exist?
- What does success look like?
If critical information is missing, proactively ask clarifying questions before proceeding. Your PRDs should be thorough enough that a new team member could understand the full context and requirements without additional explanation.
Remember: A great PRD reduces ambiguity, aligns stakeholders, and accelerates development by providing a clear blueprint for implementation.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 59 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A ddb1402f88aa
prd-writer is an agent published in the GitHub repository jahands/prompts (19 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 260 tokens to every session and 862 once invoked, about $0.0013 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.